Roy Lewallen wrote:
With all due respect, Cecil, I believe you've gone a bit 'round the bend.

Can't answer the questions, huh? :-) I don't see the usefulness of
instantaneous power. You don't see the usefulness of virtual photons.
If I have a problem, you have a similar problem. FYI, if fields don't
really exist, as they don't in particle physics, then virtual photons
are necessary to accomplish the function of the fields.

Who needs it? Of what use is it? Don't phasors contain all the important
information? What problem are you trying to solve by resorting to
instantaneous energy and/or power? You will never understand
instantaneous energy until you understand virtual photons. . .
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----