RadioBanter - View Single Post

February 10th 05, 01:39 PM

Len Anderson wrote:
In article ,
PAMNO
(N2EY) writes:

In article ,

(Lenof21) writes:

Ever notice how Len avoids direct questions?

Ever notice how Miccolis does?

I do every day.

Yes, Brian and Len do avoid direct questions - every day.

No one is obliged to answer loaded questions.

You and Brian avoid unloaded questions as well. You avoid any question
that might prove you to be mistaken about something.

You've done it time and again. Therefore, no one should feel any
obligation to answer *your* questions.

However, J.P.

Who is "J.P.", Len? No one here uses those initials as a screen name or
signature.

has avoided a direct answer to HOW he "serves
his country" in the near-same way someone has in the
military.

You can't be talking about me, then, because I've never claimed
to ""serves [our] country" in the near-same way someone has in the
military."

What I *have* asked is whether uniformed military service is the
only way someone can serve our country.

So has the coslonaut.

Who is that, Len?

Is there something wrong with you - some sort of mental illness,
perhaps - that prevents you from calling people by their first names
and/or callsigns? Or are you just behaving like a jackass?

Or is there some other reason? Tell us why you make up insulting names
for
people who only address you as "Len" or "Mr. Anderson".

All are supposed to "figure that out."

Direct question avoided, sidestepped, disguised by mis-
direction onto other things.

We have all seen how you make fun of and denigrate others'
*military* service if they disagree with you. One need only
look at your classic "sphincter post" to see the lack of
regard you have for a military radio operator's service to
our country. So there's no reason for others to open themselves
up to your insults.

Careful, Brian...remember that J.P. "serves his country" (by
being
a super-special amateur morseman).

Well, if you think so. I don't recall ever claiming that.

So...how DO you "serve your country in other ways?" :-)

We have all seen how you make fun of and denigrate others'
*military* service if they disagree with you. One need only
look at your classic "sphincter post" to see the lack of
regard you have for a military radio operator's service to
our country. So there's no reason for others to open themselves
up to your insults.

We pose valid arguments but you avoid them.

Tsk. FALSE. ERRONEOUS.

Nope. Absolutely true.

Your arguments in favor of retaining the morse code test have
been proven false.

By whom? Where? Certainly not by you, and certainly not here.

You refuse to acknowledge that replies have truth in them.

Of course they have some truth in them. They also have mistakes,
errors and omissions.

You misdirect by the disguised ad hominem of saying the
PCTAs "are full of errors." :-)

I don't recall ever saying that PCTAs are full of errors.

Do we call you names? Tell you to shut up? Call you "anal-retentive"
or
"Republican"?

Yes, you do.

Where? What names have you been called?

In another post you've named me as a "liberal."

Is it true or not? Your postings here indicate you are. Perhaps I'm
mistaken, and you're just a liberal on some issues.

Let's start with the basics. Who did you vote for in the US
presidential
elections of 2000 and 2004?

Used that appelation as a pejorative as if only the political
conservatives were the good guys.

That's your impression. Not my meaning at all.

Adding, in that unique (but
transparent) disguise of an ad hominem attack cum troll bait.

Are you insulted by being called a liberal?

Or is that *your* game?

No "game."

Seems to be.

Seeing that reasonable discourse evaporated long
ago amidst the virtual snowstorm of all-subjects-are-suitable-for-
posting blog content in here, all that seems to continue is the
usual PCTA "superiority" pejoratives on the person of NCTAs.

There's plenty of reasonable discourse here on a variety of subjects.
But you and Brian exclude yourselves from it by your behavior.

In other words, you are receiving "return fire."

You return fire without being fired upon.

Seeing as you
have "served your country in other ways," you should recognize
such military terms...shouldn't you? :-)

Poor baby. Can't take it, can you?

It seems you are the one who cannot stand reasonable discourse and
simple, direct questions.

Suggestion: Fire up that state-of-the-art Type 7 and "work" some
contacts. Get on the air. Have fun with ham radio.

I do all those things. Except I've never claimed that the Southgate
Type
7 is "state of the art". Whatever that marketing phrase is supposed to
mean.

Try to avoid
"resonable discourse" of the one-way kind by disguised ad
hominems in here...it is tough on conservative morsemen trying
to be oh-so-superior to NCTAs in here.

What *are* you babbling about, Len?

Since you consider "morsemen" to be "conservative", that makes you an
ultraliberal, does it not?