On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 07:56:05 -0500, Dave Hall  wrote: 
 
On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 21:25:37 -0800, Paul Johnson  
wrote: 
 
Vinnie S. wrote: 
 
 So is driving 56 mph in a 55. But I am sure you have never done that. 
 Hypocracy at it's finest. 
 
Depends on the state.  Most states give you 10% leeway for differences in 
speedometer calibration.  Oregon doesn't have speed limits in most places, 
opting for a less strictly enforced posted speed (difference is the posted 
speed signs say SPEED, whereas hard limits say SPEED LIMIT).  In either 
case, if conditions are bad, you can get a speeding ticket for going slower 
than the posted speed (ie, doing 50 in a 60 zone on ice). 
 
In Pa. they are required to give 5 MPH to take care of "Speedometer" 
and speed measuring inaccuracies. In addition, just to avoid court 
challenges to the precise accuracy of the speed measuring equipment 
(Usually VASCAR on non-state patrolled roads, and RADAR on state 
police patrolled roads), most of the cops I know tell me that they 
unofficially give people 9 MPH over the posted limit before they start 
pulling people over. Of course there might be a new hard-assed rookie 
who might not be so "kind"....... 
 
 
My brother in law is a cop. It's at the descretion of the cop. Since most often 
this is a revenue generating system. The judge and cop are on the same municipal 
team. If they want to beat you at 1 mph, they will. The reason they give 10mph 
extra, is because everyone goes over the speed limit. They would be up to their 
ears in court. So they take the abusers. But I highly doubt it's the 
inaccuracies of the equipment or speedometers, because like you said, some 
states have zero tolerance. So don't think you can claim the equipment is 
inaccurate in one state, and perfect in another. I really think it's just the 
descretion of the cop. 
 
Vinnie S. 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |