RadioBanter - View Single Post

February 16th 05, 10:50 PM

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:50:23 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
I snipped nothing from that passage.

(You certainly did. You snipped paragraph (1), which authorizes the use
of "a mechanical or electrical speed timing device", devices that are
-not- limited by paragraph (4). IOW, if the cop -can- bust for doing 56
in a 55 zone if he uses a mechanical speed timing device (e.g, the
speedometer in his own vehicle). ))

Again, I snipped nothing from the passage

that I was excerpting to make my point.

Of course,,,he originally snipped "nothing", but here we go on cue,
David coming back after his claim to redefine what he "really meant. So,
even though he said he snipped nothing, yet he did, he comes back with
"Well, what I 'really meant' was".....

. I provided the link to the whole statute, but I

only copied paragraph 4, since that is the one

which pertains to this whole subject.

And neatly contradicts your falwed interpretation of the law.

For the sake of brevity and bandwidth, I chose
not to copy the WHOLE thing. That's why I

also posted the link. If, as you are implying, I

was attempting subterfuge, would I have

provided the link?

(So what were you saying about knowing the law? )

I can at least READ it.

And misintepret the majority of it.

David T. Hall Jr.

N3CVJ

"Sandbagger"