View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old February 17th 05, 10:42 PM
J M Noeding
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:35:11 +0800, budgie wrote:

On Wednesday, 16 Feb 2005 09:42:58 -500, "Asimov"
wrote:

"budgie" bravely wrote to "All" (16 Feb 05 12:52:14)
--- on the heady topic of " Something like a diplexer"

bu From: budgie
bu Xref: aeinews rec.radio.amateur.homebrew:2181

You missed a step called a directional coupler. It's a sort of
transformer with 2 input ports and 1 output port. The 2 inputs don't
see one another but their power is combined at the output.


bu You don't actually *need* a directional coupler. I have seen window
bu preselectors with five separate sections for sub-bands between 403 and
bu 520 MHz. The configuration is symmetrical (in/out) with simple bandpass
bu filter segments and coaxial split/combine harnesses. Not a DC or
bu hybrid in sight. I am presuming - not having swept one - that at "off"
bu frequencies each parallelled leg presents a high enough impedance to
bu the split junction that the effect is negligible.

Yes but it requires some effort and cost to build the 2nd BP filters so
I wonder if it's any more difficult to do either? What do you figure?


I'm not sure we are on the same wavelength here (no pun intended). For
*non-overlapping* filter sections, the bandsplit through two bandpass sections
25-500 and say 550-3000 should be able to be achieved with T-pieces at the input
and output ends (although it appears the O/P didn't achieve this).


it looks like different wavelength to me, but I believe it is
described in ARRL handbook how to build such combiners

73, LA8AK
---
J. M. Noeding, LA8AK, N-4623 Kristiansand
http://home.online.no/~la8ak/c.htm