View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 22nd 05, 06:43 PM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default Lennie Anderson...Self Destructive Or Just Doesn't Get It...?!?!

wrote:

Philosophically speaking (in the old sense of philosophy),

electrons
fields and waves don't recognize any human definitions of service
work by the same principles of physics. Olde tyme hammes don't

(or
can't) think that way. They seem to think that a HAM radio thing
will ONLY work for a licensed radio amateur and that such a thing
is different if used for any other radio service. Now THAT

thinking
IS wrong...besides being dumb.


Once again you demonstrate that you are incapable of seperating
the apples and oranges.

This forum never was about discussing electronic THEORY.

It's about discussing Amateur Radio POLICY...The application of
(operating) programs and techniques...Not about the insides of the box.

You've been told that over and over. You keep trying to make it
an "issue" since you cannot..WILL not accept that you are not
knowledgeable or skilled in Amateur Radio PRACTICE.

Sitting in ham newsgroups and hurling libelous
filth against all who oppose him? :-)


At every opportunity.


Nice editing. Lennie! No "snip" stated...

He has much confusion on the word "service" for example:


Here we go again........

The FCC uses the word "service" in regards to the type and kind of


Radio activity being regulated...such as broadcasting or maritime
radio or citizens band or private land mobile, etc., etc.

Steven's
postings tend towards his imagining the amateur radio "service" as
being a continuation of some "military service" such as the USMC.
That way of thinking allows him to put on his NCO rank and boss
others around as if he had the pursed lips of a Dill instructor
(complete with flat-brimmed campaign hat). Problem is, he doesn't
have such rank, doesn't have such authority, in a civilian hobby
activity (amateur radio). Nonetheless, he attempts to bully

others
around "as if" (as the eastern colloquialism has it).


I understand "service" better than you obviously ever have,
Lennie.

I have "served" my communities as a Red Cross, ARES and Civil Air
Patrol volunteer.

I "served" the United States as a United States Marine.

I "serve" the needs of my community today as an Emergency
Department Nurse and again as a member of CAP.

YOU, on the otherhand, misrepresented the character of your
military service, insinuated that you have served "under the threat" of
threats that never existed while you were in the Army, and have proudly
boasted that you leave all other forms of community service to
others...even worse, you lamely attempt to misrepresent the services
and sacrifices of others as "patriotic buffoonery".

You are not a licensed Amateur. You cannot, therefore, be
any kind of a judge of what Amateurs should do or how they should

do
it.


The two sentences are a typical example of newsgroup bullying.

It is also typical of the fantasy of eliteness wallowed in by so
many olde tyme hammes up to their armpits in self-
righteousness.


Hey, Your Two-facedness...YOU were the one just two days ago
telling people what they were and were not qualified to "judge" others
on based on their lack of a degree or employment in electrical
engineering.

So now such logic DOESN'T apply to you and Amateur Radio...???

Such self-righteousness FAILS in the USA...(SNIP)


You've tried this before. Still not germane.

Nonetheless, those self-righteous self-appointed-sheriffs of ham
radio want to RESTRICT access to public newsgroups on THEIR
terms.


SNIP. Tried this before too. Seems YOU have no problem deciding
who "is" or "isn't" qualified to post here, yet can't stand it when
that same "logic" is heaped back on you.

Nobody tells them what to do! They think they rule. :-)
They don't but that doesn't stop those middle-aged "boyz in da
'hood" from spraying their "turf" graffitti where they want.


Lennie, you're not even from the next block over, yet you seem to
have no problem "spraying" whatever you want wherever you want.

The PCTA extras go a step further. They also spray some kind
of time stasis on everything in U.S. amateur radio, demanding a
retro condition of timeless holding to old, outdated regulations
that they bought into when young and a newbie to ham radio.
They were brainwashed into a false idealism and have never
cleared themselves of those olde ideals.


Again, one more absolute lie uttered by Leonard H. Anderson.

Leonard H. Anderson IS a pathological liar. He finds it easy to
lie.

He is much into Titles, Rank, Privilege, plus being able to Show
it through pretty certificates (suitable for framing) and medals.
It's his personal bling-bling. If a federal or state agency can
give him title, rank, status or privilege, they are favored...as
long as they don't interfere with that title, rank, status or
priviledge.


Again, Lennie, you demonstrate an intolerance for accepting that
others EARN what they receive.

The FCC did not GIVE me anything. I earned what I have.

The way I see it, I have only been "given" three things:

First of all was life...I had absolutely no say in that.

Second was an education. I was given no option in taking or not
taking it (at least until age 16...) and thankfully the people who gave
me life also gave me an appreciation for that education and what it
could ultimately provide.

Lastly was citizenship as a United States citizen. Just like life
and education itself, it was mine to do with as I pleased, and
thankfully it served me well. In return I serve it to the best of my
ability.

You just give "service", well..LIP service.

He fails to substantiate his "seven hostile actions."

Such a big claim, zero evidence. And his credibility is such that

we
just can't give him a pass. Nope. No pass.


It's all part of a curious form of gamesmanship in here, all bluff
in Steven James' case. He wants to be a SOMEBODY of
fame, to be "recognized" and respected for his accomplishments.
If that means stepping all over what others have done, calling
all their claims "lies," then he will do that...and has. He does
not need to verify his claims by giving details such as place
and date. We are all expected to "believe" him lest we incur
an avalanche of subsequent insult postings (along with failure
to give details). He will bully all who do not accept that.


If I cared about "recognition", I would have been a rock star or
politician.

As for the "lies"...well, Lennie, you and Brain still have a ton
of unanswered questions out there, and the two of you seem to do just
fine in leaving it to others to see what you are.

All of us are somebody and each of us is unique. We can
grow and learn by sharing experiences, data, results...or we
can engage in countless, mindless flame wars ignited by
those who cannot handle strong opposition to certain
opinions. But, personal insults exist and some must be
dealt with as in the spiteful postings of Steven James.


Nothing "spiteful" in my rubbing YOUR nose in YOUR foolishness,
Lennie...Or Brian in his...

If ya don't like the smell, well...all I can say is be more
careful of what you eat.

He wants to ridicule others for having worked for what they have.
As one example, he ridicules my long period of formal college
education as a "night school" (in the manner of remedial
language lessons put on by some local communities).


Oh NO, Lennie...I NEVER suggested your "night school" was
"remedial" ANYthing...What I HAVE suggested is that it was ludicrous to
expect us to believe you took 14 years to accomplish what is basically
a 3-4 year program....ESPECIALLY since you are as wise as you claim to
be.

Those "night school" classes were fully accredited college

courses.
Working a full day and then going to class at least three nights
a week is hard work...worse on work overtime or having to
cancel a whole semester due to the company sending me on
field trips. Such is denigrated, made fun of by him...as if one
going to "night school" was "stupid, ignorant, or slothful."


You put "stupid, ignorant or slothful" in quotations, and you KNOW
I never said those things.

What I DID say I HAVE said is that you were incompetent and took 3
times the average time to get your "degree".

Steven James repeatedly made fun of my Army assignment a
half century ago, saying "I embellished my 'military career' in
exaggerating things and 'dishonoring' my unit members."


You claim to have been a "radio operator", yet the MOS's you cite
were for repairman MOS's only. I have no doubt you caused RF to be
emitted, however you were never a radio operator.

You also claimed to have been responsible for passing 1.2 million
messages...THEN when confronted with the math, you changed your story
to be that it was a "team effort" of the unit. That it was, but you
still were not a radio operator, then or now. You "embellished" your
service based upon the service of others.

You then tried to elevate yourself to War Hero status based upon a
lame association-by-mmebership story with Soldiers who were KIA three
years before you were ever in-country.

THAT made you a scumbag.

I'd mentioned Army station ADA...(SNIP)


Over and over and over and over and over and............

I won't go into Steven James' vile insults about my wife other
than to say that the University of Illinois (a center for
computer research) at Urbana is NOT a "correspondence
school" taking out ads in newsstand pulp magazines.


My "insults" about your wife are nothing of the sort.

My "insults" are aimed at your involving her alleged licensure and
education somehow being yours by association.

Furthermore, if she WERE the mental health provider you insist she
is, she's incompetent. Or blinded.

It's unfortunate that this newsgroup delves into personality

battles
so often...(SNIP)


Then, Lennie, that having been said...WHY do YOIU insist on
calling people Nazi's, using childish diminutives for thier given names
and insults of thier jobs, accomplishments or other "beliefs"...???

YOU initiate it. Period. You did it with Jim Miccolis...You did
it with Hans Brakob. You did it with Jeff Herman, Steve Adell, Mike
Cosolo, Larry Roll, Kim Walker and countless others, myself included.

(UNSNIP)...or into petty arguments on definitions which have been
made years ago (such as on-off keyed CW is "not" binary in the
newest argument-for-argument sake). SUBJECTS should be
discussed, not the personalities of correspondents.


This is a forum about Amateur Radio POLICY.

Every time.

Putz.

Steve, K4YZ