NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Mon, Feb 28, 2005, 12:29pm (EST-1) Group:
=A0=A0 rec.radio.cb Subject: =A0=A0 Dave Hall, this is what you have
been looking for From: =A0=A0 itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
User-Agent: =A0=A0
Xnews/06.08.25 X-No-Archive: =A0=A0 yes Date: =A0=A0 Mon, Feb 28, 2005,
12:29pm (EST-1) X-Trace: =A0=A0
sv3-elvWuheb+VSQ+bfeYCAekOa8WGSH+FJ9ie8TbsYdYut/CdMeOTB2OvM4B8+8LYi2UUKeUv=
meyMPxjjQ!W7H1vO98k+FTufjrN8exy6xpANLMriDhaC3ElTCQ wu3bjyO6j08M9tOmSPJvOzBq=
fTVQ
X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward
a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.31
(I AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote

2) If a speeding offense under section 3362

(relating to maximum speed limits) is

charged as a result of use of a =A0device

authorized by section 3368(c) (relating to

speed timing devices), no points shall be

assigned under subsection

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= A0=A0(a) unless the
speed recorded is

ten or more miles per hour =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 in excess of

the legal speed limit.
=A0



Yet, the passage you invoke is a single exemption to the rule that
speeders can be cited at any speed infraction. Your single exemption
passage addresses only the matter of points being assessed and addresses
nothing of the fines that are assessed, the end result of receiving a
speeding ticket.


=A0=A0=A0No person may be convicted upon evidence

obtained

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= A0=A0through the use
of devices

authorized by paragraphs (2) and

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= A0=A0(3) unless the
speed recorded is

six or more miles per hour =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 in excess of

the legal speed limit.

Repeating this single exemption is fine, but does not address David T.
Hall Jr.'s erroneous interpretation of yet another law.



Furthermore, no person =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 may be

convicted upon evidence obtained through the
use of =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 devices authorized by paragraph

(2) or (3) in an area where =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 the legal

speed limit is less than 55 miles per hour if the
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 speed recorded is less than ten miles per
hour in excess of =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 the legal speed limit.



The line you posted above is in direct contradiction with the previous
line you posted. For instance, above, your passage claims 55 MPH as the
determining factor and speed, yet your previous passage gives no speed
at all, and makes only reference to a speed recorded in excess of 6 MPH
over the limit as the determining factor. Both sentences cite the same
law, same paragraph applications, yet have two separate conclusions.
They both can't be right.


This paragraph shall not apply to =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0

evidence obtained through the use of devices

authorized by =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 paragraph (2) or (3) within

a school zone or an active work =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 zone.


Nicely illustrated. You not only cite an example of David Jr. being
incorrect, but present what you apparently hold as proof.
You are holding a passage that
applies only to speeders in Pa going 55 or less. The speed limit is 65
on the interstates in Pa, and State Troopers are the only ones who use
radar in Pa. State Troopers are usually found on the interstates and
turnpikes, which is where the allowed speed limit is 65 MPH and where
the State Troopers usually employ their radar. Try this one more time:
David T. Hall Jr. (N3CVJ) claimed it was required that all speeders in
Pa be given an automatic "grace window" by the cops, permitting them 5
MPH over the posted limit. You were wrong then, you are wrong now.