On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:42:47 -0600, "Richard Fry"
wrote:

"Richard Clark" wrote:
Looking at the "efficiency" side of the equation is simple here too:
Power Consumption (nominal)
(clip)
_________________

Another case of writing without knowing, I see.

Hi OM,

Yes, I do recall your claims that contradicted Mendenhall's explicit
efficiency computations. So I see no need to pursue undocumented
claims you offer. Unless you can supply specific references from
Harris about this 80% efficiency, then such comments remain as suspect
as before.

The reason I know is that I was the author of those specs.

I am still wondering about the odd entry of:
"Each module is conservatively rated to produce
850W of power into a system VSWR of 1.5:11."

I notice you passed on discussion to this particular point of
accuracy. 11s can be explained by hitting 1 too many times, or 80 by
hitting an errant 0 too many. One of those things that escape the
notice of a spell-checker.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC