RadioBanter - View Single Post - FCC Morse, restructuring proposals could hit the street by mid-year

March 6th 05, 06:06 AM

wrote:

Alun, you must understand that Robeson's name-calling is a long-
established habit of his, his own defense against not having a valid
opinion/comeback on the subject in a thread. He goes for the
Personal Attack and then loses his objectivity in his own insults
while manufacturing "issues" that aren't there.

"Big badass Dave"

"not wearing the SS uniform with twin lightning bolts but otherwise
acting like a downsized Gestapo veteran"

"The Avenging Angle"

"concerning the Avenging Angle's further adventures in 'waste of time'"

"Jimmy Who and cronies"

"Dee Flint had a hissy fit on Thurs, Mar 3 2005 11:59 pm and hastily
scribbled the following diatribe"

"'Dee Flint' (calmed down from a previous hissy fit) jumped into a
so-called conversation and shouted out"

"Go join Mama Dee who wants to 'punish' her 'children' that don't do
what they're told!"

"Mr. Glock likes it...it's nice and shiny"

"My representative Mr. Glock will address them in that case. [he is
very accurate]"

"If the Coslonaut thinks Smith Charts are obsolete"

"Idiot. I 'looked it up' a long time ago."

"when some insufferable, self-righteous 'mama' wants to 'discipline
children as parents do'"

"Tsk. I'll bet Kellie told that to the Captain at dinner. Too bad
Tenille wasn't there"

"Poor Dan never got his crypto clearance"

"Widdle Stebie gonna have me BANNED from here"

This sampling from the past couple of weeks of r.r.a.p. were all written
by Leonard Anderson, the guy who "goes for the Personal Attack and then
loses his objectivity in his own insults while manufacturing 'issues'
that aren't there".

This "charge" that "I advocate a minimum age for amateur radio"
comes out of my Comment on docket 98-143 that was filed at
the FCC on 13 January 1998. [still on file there in the ECFS]
I submitted it via surface mail (appropriate copies per
instructions)
and then didn't follow it up. My Comment was 14 pages long and
that item was on the last page. Over a year after that filing, one
in here tried to make that a "cause celebre" as if it were
tantamount to Treason against the State! :-) Tsk, tsk. Once
that is done, some want to use that capital-crimes charge when
they can't think up enough false charges of damnation. :-)

It matters not when it was written nor does it matter that you didn't
follow it up. It matters that you wrote it. You've never disavowed it
or asked that the FCC disregard it. The charge was made because it is
absolutely true.

By the way, that "charge" came out of a news item on the
ARRL web page which featured "the youngest hams," two
SIX YEAR OLDS who "passed their written exams" for
Novice and Technician classes, respectively. Uh huh. :-)

Uh huh. Those two kids did something you've never done. It chafed you
then. It obviously chafes you now.

Uproar from the PCTAs followed, a whole fantasy scenario
of child prodigies (if they took ham exams)...

You tap danced then as you are tap dancing now.

...and a lot of sub-
threads of how the PCTA's children were also superior. :-)

Now you wouldn't want to be presented with any facts that would give lie
to the statement above, would you?

FANTASY is a very big thing among the PCTA. All seem to
think they are somehow "pioneering" the airwaves by using
morse code...

I don't know of a single soul here who has ever made that claim or
anything near it.

...well after the actual pioneering was done before
their time. Morse code is demanded of all newcomers on some
imaginary need of "showing dedication and committment to
the amateur community!" :-) That continues with labels of
"Real" hams know morse! Those hams who haven't been
federally tested for morse code are "inferior" and apparently do
not deserve their licenses. :-)

Don't worry about it too much, Leonard. You don't have an amateur radio
license to deserve.

My "expression" in here without the false facade of gratuitous
complements to the "superiority" of the olde-tymers. :-)

Is there supposed to be a sentence buried in there somewhere?

They cannot stand anyone who's been deep into radio for a
long time, done a lot, yet doesn't subscribe to their fantasies.

I'll grant you that anytime you show up, it is deep.

Heil is guilty of some of the same, although he may just
be trolling for word-fighting. Both Heil and Robeson MUST
triumph in the word-fights, will never ever admit to any
wrong-doing and always try to turn around things so the
other party is at fault.

Let me ask you a couple of plain question to see if I can get some
straight answer from you, Len. When is the last time that you ever
admitted to any wrongdoing in here? When is the last time you were
involved in a scrap here in which you didn't try to turn things around
so that the other party appeared to be at fault?

It's always about personalities and
the subjects are "right" if they mirror the ARRL words,
"wrong" if they are contrary to the holy ARRL words. :-)

I don't need the ARRL's input to tangle with the likes of you. You
simply aren't involved in amateur radio.

The pro-code-test-advocates are simply Believers in their
self-righteous attitudes, long ago brainwashed into their
little world of radio fantasy.

Do you believe in your self-righteous attitudes, Len? How about the
little world of radio fantasy you've built in which you see yourself as
being involved in amateur radio? Have you been brainwashed?

They are fanatics, almost as
fedayin ready to suicide-bomb anyone who speaks against
their idolatrous ideals.

Are you demented? How much of a fanatic would one have to be to spend
years in jousting with participants in an avocation in which you have no
part?

Perhaps their fanaticsm makes them
so angry and hateful?

Izzat how you turned out the way you did?

Dave K8MN