March 6th 05, 11:36 AM
|
|
|
Dave Heil wrote in
:
"Alun L. Palmer" wrote:
Dave Heil wrote in
:
"Alun L. Palmer" wrote:
Dave Heil wrote in news:4229580A.BDD9A351
@earthlink.net:
K4YZ wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
It's been
nearly two years since the first of those 18 petitions
arrived at the FCC and the conservative-traditionalists
mounted much cross-fire to those nasty radicals wanting
dirty, rotten change (hack, ptui) from divine, blessed,
noble olde-tyme regulations. Code MUST stay! It is
"right!"
:-)
You've really worked yourself into a froth today, old timer.
Too much caffeine?
More probably a lack of Geritol, Dave...Ot too much? Does
it matter? He's a putz either way.
These demented rants of his grow more strange by the week. His
factual errors are numerous. The legion of lurkers which he
claimed would rise to the defense of his ideas never materialized
and he's irrelevant to amateur radio in this country.
Leonard really needs a new cause.
Dave K8MN
I'm not a lurker, but I will say that Lennie is right. Granted I'm
not sure why he's still here, since he could obviously pick up a
no-code licence any time he feels like it and doesn't seem to want
to get on HF anyway? However, his satirical comments, whilst over
the top, seem to be right on the money.
Noted. You're not a lurker. You support Len's idea for having a
minimum age for entrance into U.S. amateur radio. You join "bb" in
the Len Anderson Fan Club.
Where did you get that I support a minimum age? I don't.
It is one of Len's "over the top" satirical comments (to the FCC). I
take it that you aren't in favor of pedophiles in amateur radio either
then.
Dave K8MN
What kind of question is that? I don't think issuing licences to children
makes much difference from that angle. When someone is on the air they are
in a public place.
|