"Alun L. Palmer" wrote:

Dave Heil wrote in
:

"Alun L. Palmer" wrote:

Dave Heil wrote in
:

I'm not a lurker, but I will say that Lennie is right. Granted I'm
not sure why he's still here, since he could obviously pick up a
no-code licence any time he feels like it and doesn't seem to want
to get on HF anyway? However, his satirical comments, whilst over
the top, seem to be right on the money.

Noted. You're not a lurker. You support Len's idea for having a
minimum age for entrance into U.S. amateur radio. You join "bb" in
the Len Anderson Fan Club.

Where did you get that I support a minimum age? I don't.

It is one of Len's "over the top" satirical comments (to the FCC). I
take it that you aren't in favor of pedophiles in amateur radio either
then.


What kind of question is that?

"Can't have any pedophiles in ham radio, no sir!"

--Len Anderson March 4, 2005

That kind of question.

I don't think issuing licences to children
makes much difference from that angle. When someone is on the air they are
in a public place.

I don't believe you are keeping up, Alun. I don't see a single problem
necessitating the need for a minimum age for amateur radio licensing.
Len does. His comments to the FCC are there to see.

His latest comment about pedophiles is certainly "over the top".

I'd be careful before writing "Lennie is right" unless you know
everything Len has stated--also because he deplores being called
"Lennie", never mind all the things he has called others.

Dave K8MN