wrote:

From: Dave Heil who, blabbering away on an obvious Troll topic,
scribbled on Thurs, Mar 10 2005 12:14 am:

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

You forget his comments to FCC about things like an age
requirement....

He wishes I'd forget about his comments on the minimum age requirement
for radio amateurs.

Tsk. So hard up for Personal Attack subjects that
you pick something from my Comment to the FCC made
SIX YEARS AGO? Wasn't done in here first...

Okay, I'll wait until you stop cheering for all the
"mature, responsible" six-year-olds featured on the
ARRL news as "world's youngest hams?" Riiiiight...
mature and responsible ALL BY THEMSELVES! :-)

How about the 9-year-old "extra?" A "mature,
responsible, law-abiding" pre-teener? :-)

Riiiiight...ALL of them wouldn't think of operating
without parental supervision, would they? Uh-huh.

Tsk. I've never pursued the matter with the FCC
since 1999 but it seems some in here just can't let
it go. They MUST bring it up again, time and time
again as if this is the most hideous of gaffes,
practically a felonious act against the noble, law-
fearing amateurs who never, ever do anything wrong.

The problem is, you don't understand the game Len's playing. Here's
one explanation of it (WARNING! Some explicit language!):

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-.../1358838/posts

The "Never Defend Your Own Points" portion is classic Len Anderson.
He won't answer a question in a straightforward manner.

Tsk. To answer a repeated question by big badass dave,
no, I don't beat (physically) my wife. :-)

I've never asked you any such question, little wizened Leonard.

You want "straightforward manner answers?" Okay, he

Yes, No, Yes, maybe, No, No, Yes, perhaps.

Now all you have to do is connect those answers with
your LOADED questions you post in here. :-)

Loaded questions? The two questions I posed to you some days ago
weren't loaded at all. They were in direct response to an accusation
you made.

Okay, big badass dave, here's a question for YOU:

Where SPECIFICALLY and when SPECIFICALLY did you
see "combat" in Vietnam sufficient to make you this
big badass "combat veteran" you claim for yourself?

What does that have to do with anything here on r.r.a.p? You brought up
my Vietnam service some posts ago as a part of personal attack. It
wasn't relative then and isn't now. At no time did I claim to be a "big
badass" anything. Your latest tactic is a very good illustration of what
I wrote about you--that the "Never Defend Your Own Points" portion of
the material on the link supplied by Jim is classic Len Anderson. What
brought up the issue of answering a question with a straight answer was
your recent comment below:

"Both Heil and Robeson MUST
triumph in the word-fights, will never ever admit to any
wrong-doing and always try to turn around things so the
other party is at fault."

I responded to your statement with relevant questions:

"Let me ask you a couple of plain question to see if I can get some
straight answer from you, Len. When is the last time that you ever
admitted to any wrongdoing in here? When is the last time you were
involved in a scrap here in which you didn't try to turn things around
so that the other party appeared to be at fault?"

You've still not provided straight answers to the questions. Perhaps
when and if you do, we can discuss my Vietnam service.

Dave K8MN