N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

WHAT RULE??

Who are you responding to, Toddie? Do you not know how to
quote
text of those to whom you are responding?

No, Sometimes the news reading I using will not let me.

Bull. I am using Beta Google and I get it in.

You just ahve to be smarter than the software, Toddie.

Bull, Information is both Facts and opinions, and again the FCC rules
do not state that opinions are not allowed.

"Opinions" are NOT the same as "information".

Read Websters.

The resaon last time I checked they were going after Baxter K1MAN was
because of interference, and not being at the control point. I also
found this from NEWSLINE:

ENFORCEMENT: FCC AGAIN WRITES TO K1MAN

The FCC has again written to Glenn Baxter, K1MAN, and the commissions
note
has both good and bad news for the Belgrade Lakes, Maine radio
amateur.
On
the positive side, the April 14th letter...(SNIP)

Toddie, if your "bulletins" can't get any more "recent" than YEAR
OLD posts by other entities, then you are MORE than the completely
useless idiot that I have written you off as....

My bulletins are legal, I'm not causing interference, nor am I doing
any "pecuniary intrest", I'm at the control point when my program is
running and my programs are amateur related. The problem is pea brain
bullhead morons like you who can't get over the fact that it's legal.

Keep repeating that over and over and over Toddie..........

Get that education you were sparking about, big boy...And if
you
ever need a clearance for a federal contract for work, good luck
getting it with a history of federal citations under your belt. Any
company you may work for in the future that requires clearances
will
have to ID you to the feds ( as they will anyone connected with any
particular job ). How long do you think they will keep you around
when
a multi-million contract hangs on having a non-acceptable person on
the
payroll?

Is the "N9OGL Show" worth THAT...?!?!

You didn't answer my question, Todd....

Is your "show" worth the potential loss of income, both due to
NAL's and fines, or due to a loss of earning potential over federal
charges and indictments?

Propagation data, operating times of DX station, LEGITIMATE
Morse
Code practice or knowing if a "communications emergency" exists on
any
given frequency or band has absolutely NOTHING to do with
"opinion",
Toddie.

The rules state (from the ARRL Website)look at (b)(6)

SNIP TO:

=A797.3 Definitions.

(25) Information bulletin. A message directed only to amateur
operators
consisting solely of subject matter of direct interest to the amateur
service.

"...OF DIRECT INTERST TO THE AMATEUR SERVICE."

Todd's spin and opinion are not facts, but are indeed, only spin
and opinion, and are of ionterest only to Todd.

"Today, the FCC announced......" is newsworthy and of potential
interest to Amateurs.

"Well, here's what I think..." is Todd running off at the mouth
in violation of the broadcasting prohibition, when not engaged in a
bonafide two-way conversation.

Todd N9OGL
FREE SPEECH AVOCATE

"Todd, N9OGL, Free Speech Abuser"

You're an idiot, Todd, but it's correctable. At least if you
act
soon.

You're still an idiot and your window of opportunity for
correction is narrowing.

Steve, K4YZ