If I remember correctly the worst point to the rear 180 degrees
was more than 40 db down. But I must point out that nobody
accepted my theoretical analysis regarding the phase/ current magnitude
theory and even tho my models show an INCREASE in lobe width because
it reflected a circle on the gain side one should certainly question what I
say.
There are many better educated people than I on this group and if not one
came forward and blest the theory then it would appear that my theory is
flawed,
my vector diagram is flawed and also my modelling is flawed. My only
disapointment was that none came forward to point out the flaw or just
assumed without mathematical reason that it must be flawed.
Yet at the same time many are anxious to find out how I managed
to lower the TOA. even in the face of presumed flawed analysis.
Weird. very weird yet again none declared it impossible
Regards
Art



"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:35:18 -0800, Richard Clark
wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 05:21:29 GMT, "
wrote:
specifically with respect to F/B
What was it before and to what amount was it improved ?
Hi Art,

What are the answers to these same questions applied to your design?

Tuff question. No doubt, not all is known about antennas....