K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
A simple search on Google turned up more than 8 pages of articles
on K1MAN.

Snip to...

The full commission dismissed it.....here's a an article from 2004:


ENFORCEMENT: FCC AGAIN WRITES TO K1MAN

The FCC has again written to Glenn Baxter, K1MAN, and the
commissions
note
has both good and bad news for the Belgrade Lakes, Maine radio
amateur.
On
the positive side, the April 14th letter informs K1MAN that a
review
of
his
transmissions indicates that he is complying with the Amateur
Service
regulations
regarding broadcasting and bulletins and station control.

The negative? The FCC alleges that K1MAN is in violation of rules
regarding use
of his Amateur station for pecuniary interest and those regarding
deliberate
interference to ongoing communications.

Also, the letter again told Baxter that his "felony affidavit
complaints" will not be
accepted by the regulatory agency. He was also reminded that all
frequencies in
the Amateur Radio Service are shared. No frequency is assigned for
the

exclusive use of any station, and that Baxter's station has no
greater rights to a
frequency at any particular time than does any other Amateur
station.

NEWSLINE ~ 2004

So try again....

And your own cite once again is your undoing, Toddie...

Read it again...

The negative? The FCC alleges that K1MAN is in violation of rules
regarding use
of his Amateur station for pecuniary interest and those regarding
deliberate
interference to ongoing communications.

I specifically stated that K1MAN has a track record of
misconduct issues to warrant reconsideration of a renewal in October
2005.

YOUR post simply acknowldeged what I said...he's got a track
record of misbehaviour that continues today.


Interference has nothing to do with his "content"(as I've repeat over
and over his content except Pecuniary interest is LEAGAL!. The same go
mine, as long as it's amateur related it don't matter if it's
opinionated or not it's legal.) and as for Pecuniary Interest, all he
has to do is stop advertising his website. But I think your missing the
point here...these are NOT NAL or Final "ORDER" from the FCC they are
only warning letters, which basically don't mean ****.
Todd N9OGL


Other threads in this NG have also that he's returned to his
previous patterns of "operation".

Just like I said.

Steve, K4YZ