K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
K4YZ
By Todd Daugherty N9OGL
I have seen on this newsgroup that Steve, K4YZ is trying to call me
out.
Oh, No, Todd...I am not "calling you out". That would suggesdt
that I consider you an "opponent", and the the facts are taht you're
not up to the task.
However, instead of playing his "game" Let's get back to the real
issue at hand.
The real "issue at hand" was getting you to to own up to the fact
that YOU are "calling people out" by calling them "appliance
operators", etc.
OK...That presumes that YOU are NOT an "appliance operator".
All
I want to know is are YOU living up to some higher standard, and if
so,
how about some description of your alleged homebrew/kitbuit station.
Instead of just listing it here, you go into a lengthy diatribe
trying to avoid further humiliating yourself.
Too late.
In the post "For The Benefit of Lloydie and Toddie" you
made the statement towards me "To Toddie, I say go ahead and spend
the money on legal issues if you want...I'd rather spend them on
enjoying Amateur
Radio.
Uhhhhh....Yup.
Of course your posts in here have pretty well set the tone for
what kind of reaction you can expect. People don't want to get
"information" from the decietful, dishonest or the lame.
You're all three."
Uhhhhhh...Yup. You are. This post I am responding to is
evidence
of it.
You call everyone else "appliance operators", yet don't identify
a
single piece of homebuilt gear at N9OGL.
My point made.
Yet, I posted the warning letter from the FCC stating:...(SNIP)
YadaYadaYada.
Big snippage of same repeated posturing.
Then I posted another
poll, which stated "When you Voted on the orginal poll had your
heard
N9OGL INFORMATION BULLETIN and did it effect your vote?" on that
poll
along with your little buddies on here voted YES, and then you got
on
this newsgroup and started a little thread about the second poll.
Let's
talk about that second poll, I did the second poll to prove a
point,
which was that you and your little friends on this newgroup were
voting, not because you heard the transmissions, but because you
believed the information bulletins I was transmitting were illegal.
Yet, you and your little buddies still voted yes claiming that you
heard the transmissions.
I claimed nothing on the second poll other than to make fun of
how
you didn't get the answers you wanted on the first so you went
fishing
with the second. You'd just trash THAT poll too, so why bother.
I'm not playing YOUR game. It's just too transparent.
First off, you couldn't of heard the
transmissions as I stated many times before most of my Information
Bulletins are ran on 10 meters around 9/10 PM CST when the band
conditions are dead.
No...actually you've been citing a 20 meter frequency. But
let's
not let facts interfere with your rant, Todd.
I was only on 20 meter for a short time because the tape got jammed in
the machine. But then MAJORITY of my transmissions were on 10 meters.
Unless you have a SUPER HAM STATION down there in
bum#### Tennessee I REALLY doubt you heard my weak signal.
(1) I don't need a "SUPER HAM STATION", Todd. My very modest
station has worked DXCC very nicely from TN. Even Illinois.
(2) The "weakness" of N9OGL is not in the amount of RF being
radiated from the transmitter, but of the weakness of maturity and
competency of it's owner/operator.
So before
you get on a newsgroup call someone decietful, dishonest, lame, and
a
liar you better know what the #### your talking about. Because in
my
humble opinion your not only lying to these people but your lying
to
yourself.
I'm lying to neither...least of all you, Todd.
K1MAN HAS established a pattern of rules violations that MAY
permit the FCC to take some sort of action when his license comes up
for renewal in October. This is not in debate since YOU have quoted
the very same incidents on your rants.
Warning Letter's are NOT the final action of the FCC, and as far as
I've seen thats all he has recieved so far. If he corrects the problem
then there is no problem. The problem is dumb hillbillies like yourself
who believe that information bulletins can't opinionated...which is NOT
TRUE.
N9OGL is starting on the same path. Therefore, although the
"new
kid on the block", it is highly likely that he will accumulate the
same
record of warning letters, attention of federal law enforcement, and
scrutiny. This too is true since you've already acknowledged that Mr
Hollingsworth is allegedly paying attention already.
Accually that was sent by someone CLAIMING TO BE HOLLINGSWORTH, it was
not sent by him.
N9OGL has made disparging references to other participants of
this
forum as "appliance operators", suggesting that HE is not. He's been
asked to ante up to that insinuation but instead launched into this
diversion.
Didn't work.
N9OGL has made direct asserions of being an "inventor" but has
yet
to pony up a single "invention". He DID make reference to an idea
for
a bottlenecked point-to-point data protocol that is at least four or
five "generations" of data transfer technology old.
First off it don't have to be bottlenecked IF it ran on one of higher
frequencies where there is commercial available equipment, Secondly I
have Posted SOME of my inventions on my website, N9OGL INVENTIONS.
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhh....we're so UNimpressed.
He also created another "blog" for the purpose of enlightening
the
world as to his technical wizardry, but still has yet to make good on
that.
REALLY??? Look Again!
So...there's somone lying to himself here, Todd, and son, it
ain't
me.
Now...back to the REAL question at hand...What equipment makes
up
the station line-up at N9OGL?
Bottle line slimeball, I have built equipment, I have so many radio's I
DON'T USE THEM ALL. But I have Built 2 meter and 440 transmitters.
As a matter of fact I'm planning to put my information bulletin om 2
meter, and I'm going to build the transmitter for the bulletin station
on 2 meter.
I say that if you can't answer THAT question in the very next
reply to this post, that you are proving exactly what I've been
alledging.
Steve, K4YZ
Todd N9OGL
|