Dave Heil wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

Even if your reply had included attributions, Todd, it would still be
difficult to read.

Under the Communication Act of 1934 the FCC has juridiction over
interstate and foreign commerce via wire or radio, Intrastate
communications is the juridiction of the state.

That's simply wrong if you're discussing radio.

First off you F--king C--K S--KER, what I was refering to was the
FCC
pushing the burden of proof onto people in the courts, The old
saying
you innocent into proven guilty is not true to the FCC...

Your archived posts pretty well do you in. It looks like you went
from
"innocent into proven guilty" all by your lonesome. Your own
archived
words show you to be guilty of breaking any number of FCC regs.

I think he's more reknowned for breaking a few law of nature,
Dave!

...is more like
your guilty until you prove yourself innocent, In some instance the
FCC
has already made their decision before all the facts are gathered.

Doesn't look that happened with regard to issuing you a broadcast
license.


No dumb ass, the point is the FCC should serve the public's
interest a
lot better then they do, instead the serve the special interest
more
The special interest is only there to serve one
person...themselves.

Wow! That's quite enlightening. The special interests are in
reality
just one person?

The point of 10 was, and although it's screwed up i'll explain. The
question of Interstate Communications is not defined, simple for
this
reason. the courts and congress believe that ALL RADIO
transmissions,
despite their power, antenna height, and frequency is interstate by
nature. This stems from a federal court case dealing with a radio
station from the 1930's and later to CB cases in the late 50's on
to
present time.

Interstate communications regulation was defined long ago. Your lack
of
understanding doesn't mean that there is no definition.


The problem with interference of the aircraft band is although
there
has been cases of interference there is really no "proof" that it
happened.

Really? And you know this how?

K4YZ: "(I am kinda hoping K2ASP might "drop a dime" on some old
friends
in Gettysburg to start the mill moving on Toddie now!)"

GO FO IT!!! I DARE YOU!!! but you better know what your getting
youself into....

A debate with a mental midget? A lawsuit from a guy who doesn't seem
to
have enough loot to pay an attorney's retainer? What would he or Phil
be
getting into, Todd? All that's needed for proof of your misdeeds and
lack of character is copies of your archived posts and perhaps some
copies of letters you've written to public figures. If you keep
acting
like a mad man, you could end up getting your amateur radio license
yanked. If it happens, you can blame yourself.

The frequent "name changes", threats, admissions of wrongdoing as
they pertain to clandestine radio operation...

I'd say he's digging himself in pretty well.

73

Steve, K4YZ