"RHF" wrote in message
oups.com...
JD,
.
Her "Questionable Accident" had the Police initially
looking at the Husband as the possible Criminal 'cause'
of the Injuries to the Wife.

Not true. There was no questionable accident. The cause of her death has
clearly been established in a court of law, and there was a malpractive
judgement awarded based on those findings. The issue of of abuse did -not-
come up during the trial, simply because it wasn't an issue. You can bet
your ass that if there was even the remotest chance that her situation was
caused by abuse rather than malpractice it would have come up. It didn't.
The abuse thing appears to be nothing more than attempts to demonize the
husband.

If as reported HE has a long term common-law wife and
a couple of children.

He does.

Then... Why Not ? Do the Right Thing and Let the Parents
take responsibility for their Daughter.

Because the way he sees it, his first wife is for all intents and purposes
dead. Just because he's with another woman doesn't mean that he no longer
loves Terry any more than it means that a remarried widower no longer holds
any affection for his first wife. It's been established repeatedly that
Terry wouldn't have wanted to "live" like this, and he feels obligated to
honor her feelings. It's quit simple, really. Quit listening to nuts like
Al. They're the ones making this stuff up. (Come on...the latest story is
that when they went to remove the tube, she cried out "I want to live!"
Someone here recently mentioned that they'd heard that on SW. I've seen it
elsewhere as well.) Don't listen to Al, and certainly don't assume that I'm
right. Try to go to primary sources for your info. As for doing the "right
thing", her father said in court that he'd keep her alive even if it meant
losing all of her limbs (a reference to her diabetes) and keeping her on a
respirator. This, despite the fact that, as established by the courts, she
wouldn't have wanted to be kept alive as she is...much less in a worse
condition. (Look it up.) He's -doing- the right thing.

It seems like the Husband is afraid to let his Wife be
Revived; because She just may 'implicated' Him as
"The Cause of Her Accident.

Again, it's already been established beyond any doubt. Furthermore,
she -can't- be revived because the relevant part of her brain is -gone-. It
no longer exists. It died during her heart attack, atrophied away and has
been replaced by spinal fluid. No one's ever grown a new brain before, which
is the miracle that people are praying for and want to keep her alive for.
If she could be revived, this whole thing wouldn't be an issue. In fact,
we'd have never heard about it.