On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 01:35:38 GMT, "David Eduardo"
wrote:


"David" wrote in message
.. .

On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 07:21:18 -0500, "Michael Lawson"
wrote:



Still costs too much, because the "as little as $150"
is not what they will pay; in the third world, it
tends to cost higher. Many people there already
own shortwaves and they don't have our need to
have the latest gadget.

If it's the 21st Century, how come we're still listening
to AM radio and watching analog televisions??

--Mike L.

$68 wholesale. There is a foundation.

AM radio and analog TV aren't relevant.

This would be why 6 of the top 10 billing stations in the USA are AM? 17 of
the top 40 stations? Including the second and 4th highest billers in the US?


Participitation in the money circus proves nothing, other than the
ability to attract suckers and sheep.