"Richard Clark" wrote:
Sorry for the allusion, as it again reprises the obvious
that physical height in relation to a standard (wavelength) dominates
the principle. However as principles and seeking validation go, no
doubt the topic will drift towards top loading dwarfs...
_____________

So far you have not provided support for your statements on this subject
from any recognized antenna authority. Do you really believe that your
understanding of this, and your statements about it are better/more accurate
than those of Frederick Terman and George Brown?

RF