View Single Post
  #31   Report Post  
Old March 29th 05, 07:42 PM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I must point out that although my exchange with you has been short and
seemingly pointless; you feel a necessity to place yourself in prominence,
of both your "knowledge", opinions and your person.

I hardly wish you to keep up with such tiring and pointless expenditure of
energy on your part--I have found you to only be self-serving in your
devotion to your ego, yourself and your personal endeavors to make a fool of
yourself and destroy any sense of dignity one might have been able to afford
you.

I can only speak for myself of course, but you have completely destroyed any
credibility I could have granted you and, would only accept any offerings
from you after having checked them through other sources--since this is the
case, little is to be had from giving you any further considerations at all.



Regards


--
Hay, if'n ya'll cun't konstructivly partecipete in this disscusion, haw
aboot speel-checkin it fer me?


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:38:49 -0600, "Richard Fry"
wrote:

Terman also says

nothing about a Helical wound slim jim. Of course, this begs the
question "Why would he?"

The results are predictable, boringly so, and several have already
been down that road to no net gain. However, common sense in these
matters can be discarded if only someone offers validation, however
slim that may be from any jim. Such inventors stand on the shoulders
of dwarfs. Sorry for the allusion, as it again reprises the obvious
that physical height in relation to a standard (wavelength) dominates
the principle. However as principles and seeking validation go, no
doubt the topic will drift towards top loading dwarfs....

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC