Becareful Buck!!! It is catching, you are starting to think like me!

Regards

--
Hay, if'n ya'll cun't konstructivly partecipete in this har disscusion, haw
aboot speel-checkin it fer me?


"Buck" wrote in message
...
In some situations it is better to have a 'shortened' antenna than the
absolute last tiniest fraction of a db. I realize a cap hat can
reduce the size of a vertical with reasonably low loss, I am wondering
if it would do as well with the J-Pole?

For example, a quarter wave matching network for the J-Pole would be
whatever works best, be it original design or some form of balun, but
the 1/2 wave vertical might be reduced in size by forming a capacity
hat above it.

How well would that work for shortening a J-Pole? would it be better
to use a shortened 1/2 wave dipole or would the J-Pole design be
better?

Buck

--
73 for now
Buck
N4PGW