"wonderer" wrote in message
...

"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
et...

"Simon VK3XEM" wrote in message
...


Get over it! Go back to your CW if you want, who bothers you or bags you
for using it, I know I certainly don't.


--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452
VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/

Thanks for bringing this up Mate!.

My major problem is folks refering to interconnecting "hams" over the
internet as "ham radio". Ham radio is R A D I O . Not INTERNET
connected to Nodes then to a radio somewhere. Call it whatever you want,
but it is NOT ham radio.

Dan/W4NTI


does this also mean we cannot place the receiver
for 10M some distance away(1Km) to stop desensitisng
the receiver as the of set is narrow, the receiver and
transmitter are connected by landline ?????????.

Alf VK5ZKL

Dans' main problem was that he did not fully (or even partly) understand the
operation of IRLP and the security systems designed to prevent access. I
don't think he understood Echolink either and had the two confused as being
one and the same animal.

Walt was just plain ignorant.


Brad.