"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
k.net...
"nana" wrote in message
...
"wonderer" wrote in message
...
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
et...
"Simon VK3XEM" wrote in message
...
Get over it! Go back to your CW if you want, who bothers you or bags
you for using it, I know I certainly don't.
--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong
to.
73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452
VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/
Thanks for bringing this up Mate!.
My major problem is folks refering to interconnecting "hams" over the
internet as "ham radio". Ham radio is R A D I O . Not INTERNET
connected to Nodes then to a radio somewhere. Call it whatever you
want, but it is NOT ham radio.
Dan/W4NTI
does this also mean we cannot place the receiver
for 10M some distance away(1Km) to stop desensitisng
the receiver as the of set is narrow, the receiver and
transmitter are connected by landline ?????????.
Alf VK5ZKL
Dans' main problem was that he did not fully (or even partly) understand
the operation of IRLP and the security systems designed to prevent
access. I don't think he understood Echolink either and had the two
confused as being one and the same animal.
Walt was just plain ignorant.
Brad.
Correct....in fact I think IRLP is the best choice if one is going to use
any form of internet with ham radio.
Dan/W4NTI
Yayyyy!!!!!!!!!
Brad.