N9OGL wrote:
You didn't answer my question.

Does the cable company NOT have control over thie own assets?
Yes or no wil suffice nicenly, thank-you.

The ONLY POWER A CABLE COMAPNY HAS OVER THE CONTENT IS THE AVABILITY
OF
THE CHANNEL( I.E. SET UP THE TIME THE PROGRAM IS TO AIR) AND THAT'S
IT!!!

Stop screaming and slow down. You already type like a fool and
you only get worse when you act this way.

I didn't say the FCC had jurisdiction, Todd. Please stay focused.

I said that the COMMUNITIES have the right to determine the nature
of the content in thier communities

But it isn't the community that's the problem, it's a cable company
that doesn't want ANYONE from using the public access channel.

The cable company is IN the community (or close to it).

Gee...You're right, Todd. Threre's one of those "dum### hams
badmouthing people on USENET" right now!

And PROOF of what I've been saying all along.

Well steve if you weren't such an ###hole, perhaps I would treat you
a
little nicer.

No problem, Todd. You're an immature, developmentally delayed
adult, and I realize it. I keep prodding you in an attempt to get you
to realize your own shortcomings, but you just respond with more
screaming and more profanity.

In other words, you prove my point.

And I am sure if they knew what a swell guy you REALLY are, they
wouldn't have bothered.

I'm a hell a lot nicer then you think, again if your weren't an
###hole
I would be a little nicer.

I could care less HOW nice you could be.

You're profane, immature and technically incompetent. Call ME
all the names you care to, Todd...it WON'T change THOSE facts.

And this pertains to your operation of illegal "broadcast stations"
how?

It don't, I was pointing out that the cable company has been in
trouble
with the city for repeative violation peoples free speech on the
public
access channel.

And I say they are doing the community a favor by keeping a
profane, immature, technically incompetent idiot away from public view.

They are doing you a FAVOR Todd, but you keep trying to reprove
that you are EXACTLY what everyone else says you are.

Doesn't matter, Todd...LOX is not used as a refrigerant because
it's an O X I D I Z E R. It makes things burn, in some cases very
rapidly (please see any film clip of a Saturn 5 rocket ascending).


And if you plan on using LOX A N Y W H E R E near an electrical
source, you are introducing an I G N I T I O N source.

Now, going back to ELEMENTARY SCHOOL scinence, guess what happens
when you mix an oxidizer, an ignition source, and any FUEL...???

ok, then I'll use liquid Nitrogen then.

It's only taken you three weeks to wake up to THAT error.

Now if we can get you to work on the others......

I said your protocol is several developmental generations behind
current technology. That's NOT untrue.

The whole idea is to make an alternative system on the amateur bands
but Nazi's like you try to stop new modes of communications on the
amateur band.

I am not a Nazi, Todd.

And a "new mode of communications" that is several developmental
generations BEHIND current technology is NOT what Amateur Radio needs.

Steve, K4YZ