In article ,
says...

If you wish to file your comments with the ARRL regarding their bandwidth
proposal, there is little time left to do so. Comments should be sent to:



It is my understanding that the proposal, in it's current form, will allow
WL2K stations control of nearly 40% of ALL of our current allocations in the

snippety

What would really have helped is links to sites that support your
assertions. I've visited both the ARRL site at this link:

http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2005/04/01/1/?nc=1

...and winlink.org at this one...

http://winlink.org/sysop/PMBO_FREQ.htm

...and I can't find anything which leads me to believe that there
would be any sort of "packet-spewing robots" polluting the HF bands. In
fact, I don't see anything other than a neat-looking project to
establish a worldwide digital network that does not depend on the
Internet.

If you can give a clearer explanation of how you came to your
conclusions, including some specific references to back them up, I will
cheerfully make my voice heard at ARRL (I'm a lifetime member).

73 de KC7GR

--
Dr. Anton T. Squeegee, Director, Dutch Surrealist Plumbing Institute.
(Known to some as Bruce Lane, ARS KC7GR,
kyrrin (a/t) bluefeathertech[d=o=t]calm -- www.bluefeathertech.com
"If Salvador Dali had owned a computer, would it have been equipped
with surreal ports?"