Thread
:
Variation in modeling predictions between software
View Single Post
#
4
April 4th 05, 10:09 AM
[email protected]
Posts: n/a
wrote in message ...
These differences remain even when the 4NEC2 model is constructed with
the same number of segments as the EZNEC version and both models using
no ground (free space).
As both models are offering results to 2 decimal places I would expect
to be able to trust them to 1dp. Am I just kidding myself that modeling is
this accurate (Ignoring all the real world variations)?
Just noticed above posting. To be 100% sure nothing went wrong, I
would love to take a further look at the cause of the differences
between both models. If possible could you send me the EZnec and (and
the (4)nec2) model...
Arie.
Reply With Quote
