David T. Hall Jr. (sandbagger) N3CVJ wrote:
That goes both ways. Perhaps if you didn't put
on the appearance of being somewhat

bothered by those guys, they wouldn't be so

quick to hassle you.

Dave's speaking for Dougie, again.

Remember, they didn't come looking for you.

As opposed to what, exactly? Mopar accepting Dogie's invite and threat?

Like I said to Landshark, it takes two to tango.

That was not meant as a criticism, just a

neutral observation.

Sure, sure,,a "neutral" observation whose first knee jerk reaction when
Dogie was busted was to jump to his defense and lie and say someone
someone withdrew the complaint against him to the FCC. See Dave, when
the FCC places a hammie on the Rain Report and informs the world they
have evidence before them that indicates he was in violation of FCC law,
and you come along and attempt to say otherwise and that the FCC could
be wrong, is in no manner "neutral", It's simply another case (of many)
where you are not in any remote sense of the word "neutral". The
contingency recognizes this fact and several have illustrated and
commented on your position and hypocrisy. The again, it is your right to
insist on remaining detached from reality and refusing to view yourself
as you really are, such as how others and the majority view you. You
claiming the majority misunderstands you, via explaining what you
"really" meant (usually accompanied by you applying incorrect
definitions of words and terms) adds to the joke.

David T. Hall

N3CVJ

"Sandbagger"