Thread
:
Imax ground plane question
View Single Post
#
4
April 6th 05, 03:28 PM
I AmnotGeorgeBush
Posts: n/a
From:
(jim)
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 19:20:17 -0500, landsharkdeepthroatsmen
wrote in
:
Frank Gilliland wrote in
:
On Mon, 04 Apr 2005 17:53:15 -0400, Vinnie the Helpless Ham
wrote:
snip
(Which one would be better?)
http://www.bencher.com/pdf_download.html
Scroll down to "Tech Notes" at the bottom.
(He don't like you Frank, your in his Killfile. He won't see your
message unless he is like Landshark and has a imaginary kill file.)
It's clear that Vinnie avoids both confrontation
and education. But I didn't post the link for his
benefit. I posted it because others might have
the same or similar questions -- people who
want to actually learn something so they don't
need someone to hold their hand while
installing an antenna.
(that was a smack at him frank. )
Come on, Jim. Vinny takes his own "smacks" at people, unprovoked. If
you're gonna take one to task for "smacking" him, apply it evenly across
the board and direct the proper redress.
(his posts concerning his newfound amateur status was actually what this
board is all about. Never mind its about an amatuer question but rather
radio in general. He doesn't like you and the above post butresses his
point.)
Yet, Vinny expresses his own likes and dislikes in the same manner for
which you are chastising Frank. Vinny's personal dislikes and likes are
not any one elses problems except his own, yet he continues to foster
them upon the group by
redundantly invoking his imaginary killfile, fronting off by name those
he "includes" in such, yet, unyieldingly while not surprisingly, is
unable to control his actions. This is illustrated by him replying
indirectly to those he claims are killfiled, by incorrectly claiming he
reads their posts when they are quoted by another.
You usually are pretty ambivalent about getting involved in the ****ing
matches, but when you decide to do so, ignoring Vinny's unprovoked
attacks and illustrating others he is involved with, takes away from
your objectivity.
Reply With Quote