RadioBanter - View Single Post - While we're on the subject of funny and entertaining websites.....

April 7th 05, 01:25 PM

On Wed, 6 Apr 2005 10:11:51 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

That was not meant as a criticism, just a
neutral observation.

Sure, sure,,a "neutral" observation whose first knee jerk reaction when
Dogie was busted was to jump to his defense and lie and say someone
someone withdrew the complaint against him to the FCC.

You're lying again. I never made any such claim.

See Dave, when
the FCC places a hammie on the Rain Report and informs the world they
have evidence before them that indicates he was in violation of FCC law,
and you come along and attempt to say otherwise and that the FCC could
be wrong, is in no manner "neutral", It's simply another case (of many)
where you are not in any remote sense of the word "neutral".

I simply offered that based on Doug's "notoriety", that it was
potentially possible that he could have been framed. Nothing more. Yet
you zizz and drip over this as if I shot and killed the Pope, further
illustrating you obsessiveness.

The contingency....

.....of one (you).

recognizes this fact and several have illustrated and
commented on your position and hypocrisy.

You don't know the meaning of the word.

The again, it is your right to
insist on remaining detached from reality and refusing to view yourself
as you really are, such as how others and the majority view you.

Ah yes, the majority of people who you base support by the number of
magazines that sell which contain your fishing articles.

You
claiming the majority misunderstands you

No, you are claiming there's a "majority" (Which has been strangely
silent), the truth is there is only you.

, via explaining what you
"really" meant (usually accompanied by you applying incorrect
definitions of words and terms) adds to the joke.

Provide even ONE example of my misuse of any term.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj