Thread
:
While we're on the subject of funny and entertaining websites.....
View Single Post
#
50
April 7th 05, 09:02 PM
I AmnotGeorgeBush
Posts: n/a
From:
(Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 04:03:02 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
Yet another example of someone who had their feelings hurt and who is
now on a personal vendetta. It's childish in any case.
Dave
"Sandbagger"
(=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Remember Dave, were talking about sic
individuals that send you virus, threatening emails & posts, foul vulgar
language, create web pages with all sorts of false images & accusations.
)
Hmm, some could argue the same for the
other side, with the posting of pictures of
certain individuals and their antennas and
such.
The acts you describe will not support "some" who would argue such a
position.
(Again, remember that Geo & Doug for YEARS have been making websites
dedicated to Mopar & I, so where does the fact that in just a year Mopar
posted pics of Dougs antenna say that he's started all this mess? )
Where did I ever say that you guys started it?
Umm,,this is where your failed memory comes into play, Davie. Go
ahead,,for the record and enjoyment benefit of those who may have missed
your claim,,,,,..deny you never claimed that illegal cbers started the
mess with Dogie by what you claimed was "flaunting" their illegal
actions. Off you go, now.
I never made any such insinuation.
TYVM. You came right out and said it,,there was no "insinuation".
But at this
point it really doesn't matter who started it.
Not to you, because you support those who began it. This was illustrated
when the FCC busted Dogie and told the world via the Rain Report he was
breaking FCC rules by jamming. YOU, came on here and offered incompetent
armchair lawyering on Dogie's behalf, conjuring and lamenting to the
group that someone withdrew the complaint against Dogie....all AFTER the
fact the FCC reported him as jamming repeaters.
But
truth be told, it won't ever stop as long as
BOTH sides continue to pour gas on the fire.
That's what I meant when I said "it takes two
to tango". I agree with you that the whole thing
is childish. I can't believe that Stevo would
actually go to the trouble of driving over to
"Doug's" over an internet issue.
LOL..and many others can not believe an extra class hammie such as
yourself, who continually self-qualifies himself as some type of
knowledegable person regrading the laws that govern his hobby, would
erroneously continue to claim dxers and freebanders are federal
criminals, and not be able to comprehend the definition of civil
disobedience verses criminal disobedience and all that pertain to such.
Nevertheless, your education has been completed on this subject, as you
were reduced and forced to admitting your views holding dxers as federal
criminals all comes down to matter of perception (yours), which happens
to be wrong (as illustrated by the US judicial system as to what
differentiates civil verses criminal courts, actions, and penalties.)
He risked a potential trespassing or assault
charge all over an internet dispute.
He risked no assault charge. He was invited. If you need scholling on
the legality of this issue as well, say the word.
zzThat reminds me of the arguments and
challenges to fights that used to happen over
the CB years back.
Yearn for the past, live in the past,,,it's not relevant.
(Most here would say he deserves what gets
as a consequence of his own actions. Or
maybe he shouldn't **** with someone like me that lives so close to
him.)
That goes both ways. Perhaps if you didn't put
on the appearance of being somewhat
bothered by those guys, they wouldn't be so
quick to hassle you. Remember, they didn't
come looking for you.
(You sure about that Dave? They've posted numerous peoples address's,
phone #'s, job info, yup they didn't come looking for us. )
I don't recall anyone's correct addresses and
phone numbers being posted.
Only because you impossibly hold yourself as some sort deity who thinks
what is deemed correct and incorrect can only be judged by yourself.
There was a lot of speculation and
accusations IIRC. But that alone is not worth a
grain of salt.
My electronic logs most certainly are, and it got several isp's yanked.
But hell, my address is in the
FCC license database, as is "Doug's" and
"George's", assuming they really are who you
claim.
You address is wrong, Dave. You have yet to provide the FCC with the
correct address of where you lay your head at night.
Like I said to Landshark, it takes two to tango.
That was not meant as a criticism, just a
neutral observation.
A "neutral" observation is not possible from one who claimed Dogie's FCC
bust was recanted by a complainant who turned him in. This, in addition
to the rest of your mess, shows you know **** about the law. When the
FCC tells the world a hammie is guilty, their evidence regarding the
hammie breaking the law is practically iron-clad.
(Of course, if you stopped responding to Twist & Frank this political
crap would stop, but that was not meant as criticism, just a neutral
observation
So you contend that I am the only reason
those guys post political crap on this board?
Do you really think I'm that important?
Only you exhibit an unquenchable thirst for status you are denied among
us. The rest have been educated.
But assuming you are correct, I'm not
complaining about Twist and Frank posting
political stuff, as off the wall and conspiracy
laden as it might be.
Not everyone takes your personal complaining of Frank and myself as "off
the wall" and "conspiracy laden"....that's your paranoia acting up..it
just seems like everyone thinks that of you.
If the day comes that I do complain, you are
cordially invited to remind me that it takes two
(or three in this case) to tango. ;-)
It doesn't really matter what is responsible for your years and years of
complaints concerning illegal radio activity, as you are in denial it
ever occurred. I will admit one thing, you have left one hell of a
legacy for your child to read some day. Better hope you're dead and gone
long before she finds it.
Dave
"Sandbagger"
n3cvj
Reply With Quote