View Single Post
  #55   Report Post  
Old April 7th 05, 09:21 PM
I AmnotGeorgeBush
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Landshark)
"I AmnotGeorgeBush" wrote in message
... From:
(Landshark) "Frank Gilliland"
wrote in message
news 19:20:17 -0500, landsharkdeepthroatsmen
wrote in
: Frank Gilliland
wrote in
: On Mon, 04 Apr 2005
17:53:15 -0400, Vinnie the Helpless Ham wrote:
snip
Vinnie's not a bad guy Frank,

So I used to think as well, until he lost
personal control.

We all have at one time or another.


Yes, but......Tthe difference is, a decent human being can admit he's
wrong and offer an apology for such. You've done it, in addition to many
other regs here. Some have these -ego- problems that will not permit it.
You saying he is not a bad guy is akin of me saying the same thing about
Geo regarding his attacks on you,

Maybe, but far cry on accusations twist, so


you are comparing apples with oranges.


Unprovoked attacks accompanied with school yard name calling is what I
refer....
the nature of such unprovoked attacks
notwithstanding. Did you miss Vinny
blowing of his top?

Nope, but that was the way he felt.


The you viewed his hypocrisy in singling one person out for a typo. If
he truly felt this way, his posts would be chock full of such complaints
and emotional uncontrols. The fact that his posts lack this, illustrate
another problem he is experiencing, one that goes well beyond a typo and
the way he feels about such.

I think it was a little over board, but nothing


that couldn't be overcome


The guy came apart over a typo that had nothing to do with him.

Again, I've seen the same thing from almost


everyone here


=A0=A0I never see the majority crying and carrying on about typos.
...perhaps that was his malfunction for the day, but it shows the guy's
true self

I don't think it show his "true self", but does


show a flaw that can't be cured.


He exercised an optional choice to attack a poster as opposed to the
topic of the post, blamed it on a typo, and was called on it. Shows how
he was moved by a simple posting of a url. Maybe if it was you he
attacked for no reason other than incompetence

Maybe, but I have been the target so long, as


you, It really doesn't bother to much anymore.


It never bothered me. In fact, once I realized how much energy these
type devote to causes of which they are impotent, it became not just
entertaining, but amusing because of the control they willingly but not
consciously give up. In fact, those who go as far as to actually place
blame on other usenet particapants as the cause of their personal woes,
all share the same characteristics. Dogie blames Moped for his problems,
Geo blames you, and Dave blames me. While Geo seems to be more of a
loner, Dave and Dogie actually -look- to others for support. Such is
recognized by their deliberate misattributing quotes (Dave) to others,
lies (the three of them, including Lelnad) and the invocation of
un-named and unsolicited sources as supporting their positions (Dave and
Dogie).

I suppose if that was the case, but I don't see


him chasing Franks posts, posting false


accusation, harassing every post he makes,


big difference.


Check again. He's replying to those he claims are killfiled and calling
names in each post, taking about people's families and the such.


you two


should talk more radio, you'll probably find a


lot more in common. Now Geo I see is still


obsessed with me and male sex........pretty


sad.


Now,,I invoke to you the same exact reasoning you use for many of your
complaints with Geo

Why would Doug, Geo, Frank (in the past),


Dave among others do the same to you?


Because they didn't like you're ideology?


Freebanding? political views? our were they


just plain trolling?


Ok. Since you asked, I'm going to spill some beans, here. Doug lost
control when he came on here. When it was found that he had real
problems of the mind, I immediately backed off my responses to him. It's
not fair and it's not right to hit a child because they hit you. A
simple reprimand every once in a while is sufficient. Mopar handles that
quite well. In fact, the mere fact that Mopar handles Dogie as he does,
is testament how serious he takes Dogie's threats.
=A0=A0Frank?.....well, Frank and I went around concerning the legality
issue. Now that the dx is much more sporadic and less, I'm more legal
than Dave or Leland. After a few emails, I found Frank to be not that
different from myself regarding certain key life skills, education.
Even when we disagreed, I could learn something from Frank, as he was at
least consistent with all his positions. Dave, otoh, has
self-contradicted himself so many times and is known on this group by
the majority as a major hypocrite. Such instantly compromises whatever
integrity he managed to retain, which, after taking his posts concerning
the defense of Dogie into consideration, is zero.

Twist, I'm not going to go around with you on


this. I'm sure just like Mopar & Frank, things


got off to a bad start, hopefully in the future


things will be better, though one of them most


likely have to breakdown and bury the hatchet.

,,,,why would one attack another for no reason?
Frank has a very condescending type of tone,


but unfortunately when typing one can't tell the "
tone" of the type if they haven't been around it


for a while.



That's another parallel. Frank went as far as to come out and say "I'm
an asshole" on occasion. Way back during my infancy of arrival, I stated
I do not play well with others, do not much care what others think for
the most part, and work better alone. This leads to self-created
problems for a certain type of personality when they encounter people
such as Frank or myself, especially when they possess a controlling
personality, an unquenchable yearning and hunger for status, and are
used to most people in their world deferring to them. Dave falls into
this category. He speaks of other's feelings being hurt because -his-
feelings are hurt. He projects and regurgitates all over usenet, just as
he did in trying to say he never blamed anyone for the Dogie/Geo mess.
He most certianly has, on many occasion, and has used the
legality/illegality as his excuse to act the fool.


=A0=A0Lelnad,,well, his hatred of cb is well documented, yet he remains
here for the education. If that isn't enough, his unprovoked attacks
against dxers (Nebo comes to mind immediately, just for starters)
confirms his agenda.


There are those who have perfectly acceptable beefs concerning legalties
and illegalities. The beefs belonging to the type of which I speak, are
personal. Vinnie appears to be in this category. I base this opinion
only on HIS comments and continual unprovoked attacks and responses to
those he somehow feels are in his killfile. Nevertheless,.......
...when is your next fishing trip down south?

=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0L andshark