K4YZ wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
Our boy broadcaster/inventor has quite varied interests. Here's
some
material gleaned from the archives:

Ya know...the more I have this guy investigated, the more
muddled
he and his allegations and rants become.

Here we have him whining about the FCC "not considering (his)
waiver" in 2003...



------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.radio.pirate, Dec. 2003

ummmm....NO! I'm going to ##### and whine till I blue in the face.
I'm
not
going to let this #### go...Those scumbag at the FCC and the court
of
appeals isn't going to hear the last of me for a long time. I was
never
found guilty of a freaking crime and I ####ing barred from getting
a

license. that's the true justice of ####ing america. Although you
not
guilty....your guilty......and your guilty unless you prove
yourselves
otherwise. well I have my application (all six) and a little ****
ant
note
from some sandmonkey in the FCC say they couldn't consider my
application or
my ####ing waiver...I applied long before I went pirate and their
are
other
"pirates" out there that I know that also applied long before
going
pirate.
So I'm going to continue to bitch and whine til somethings done
about
this
injustice.

Todd Daugherty N9OGL
Langely Park Telecommunication

But according to the "website" of Todd's "Langley Park
Telecommunications group, they WERE allocated a frequency and build
permit in 2001!!!

QUOTE:

107.9 FM

COMMUNITY RADIO PROVIDING PROGRAMMING AND FREE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE
AIRWAVES

LATEST NEWS Langley Park Telecommunications is one of the 255
applicants approved by the F.C.C.

UNQUOTE:

I even went to the FCC and found this:

QUOTE:

BNPL-20000828ACC NEW TAYLORVILLE, IL
LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNUICATIONS
REQ: 107.9 MHz Channel No. 300

UNQUOTE:

So it would appear that Todd and company (most likely just
Todd...I
don't beleive there's any "company" involved) screwed the pooch AFTER
getting an "OK" from the feds FOR their operation!

Of course Todd's earlier expressions of disdain for FCC
regulations
might have had something to do with their decision to reconsider
granting him a license:

QUOTE:

from alt.radio pirate, May 1999

Well mark I tell you what, I applied twice for a licnese and both
time it was returned so your right SCREW THEM!!! I'm going on the
air

without a License.

Todd
N9OGL

UNQUOTE

Of course it may have something to do with his frequent changing
of his name. The Feds don't look favorably on name changes that
aren't
due to marriage or entrance to the Witness Protection Program.

Witness:

from alt.tv.public-access, Jan. 2001

Hi once again.... langley park has updated their home page a little
and
will continue to update it often.

Todd Daugherty
CEO/PRESIDENT
LANGLEY PARK TELECOMMUNICATION

http://www.geocities.com/langleypark...ion/index.html

And hs earlier nomme-de-guer

from alt.radio.pirate, May 2000, Todd's "origization" looks for a
type
"excepted" transmitter. The name change must reflect some on-air
personna.

hello,

My origization is wanting to apply for the LP100 license here in
Illinois when the filing window opens in August. We are looking for
a

ten to twenty watt FCC type execpted transmitter. we mainly want to
know
what the cost is on the transmitter.

Todd O'Dochartaigh
President
Langley Park Telecommunication

Is anyone keeping up with this?

from alt.radio.pirate, Feb. 2000

...reality is Public Access has it problems with local authorities
trying to censor programming and those access channel they couldn't
censor the local authorities has shut down. So sure you have a
little
radio station but watch what you say over them because if it's
something
the local authorities don't want broadcast like police's violation
of
Human rights then they will try every thing to get rid of you. "Oh
but
Todd were protected by the FCC rules" well some local authorities
give a
rats ass about the FCC or their rules. They will even go so far to
try
to ban "radio signals except those all ready established" believe
me
there are some local governments will try that. The local
government
tried back in the 80's to ban all amateur radio signals to the city
limits. then there is of course antenna laws and sure the FCC can
tell
you that the towers are exempted but the local governements have
found
loopholes in the system. I've in the public Access business longer
then
the "microbroadcasting movement" I know how it works on public
access
and my opinion that's whats going to happen to these Low Power
Radio
Stations.

Todd O'Dochartaigh
WLPS-TV CHANNEL 14
Taylorville's Pirate Television station
~Born a Pirate, Die a Pirate~

He's been "...in the public Access business longer then the
"microbroadcasting movement" I know how it works on public access and
my opinion that's whats going to happen to these low power stations,"

Well, obviously not true since he can't seem to file the
appropriate documentation with the FCC in a timely manner.

And again, represents himself with the false last name for a
television station that doesn't exist.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
from alt.radio.pirate, Aug. 1999--Todd's disability and folks
infringing
on his right to be a radio/TV pirate

First of you moron, it is my opinion and I have the right to
express
it. It federal Suckup like you who infringe on peoples
constitutional
right not only when it comes to busting Pirates but infringe on
peoples right who wish to voice their point of view on the
internet.

It is people like you that have no life instead spend most of
their
time on the net bad mouthing how people write or their opinion. I
really feel sorry for someone like you. It is in fact people like
you
who are turning this from a constitutional system to a
dictatorship.

As for my write I do have a disability and in that your lucky I
don't
get you on discrimination. The FCC is also lucky if they think
like
you
that I don't them on it to. That All i have to say to you.

Todd O'Dochartaigh N9OGL
WLPS TV CHANNNEL 14
Taylorville Illinois #1 Pirate TV station

Just muddling throught the grammar on that one was an effort.
But
basically my comment to Todd is that if you'd stop waving an "I'm
Intentionally Breaking the Law" flag, people, myself included,
wouldn't
give you a hard time.

But you do (arguing that it's your "free speech" to do so) so
just
suck it up and suffer the consequences, Todd.

You're a law breaker. You've acknowledged it yourself. It
really
is THAT simple.


Steve, K4YZ
There's a lot more there then what's been said........SO go ahead and
whine to the FCC

todd N9OGL