View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old April 10th 05, 05:50 AM
N9OGL
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reamping of last post:


FIRST OFF DICKHEAD!!!! I applied for a license long before I went on
the air without a license. Like I said before Steve you ****ing asshole

you don't know what happen and your best bet is shut your ****ing pie
hole.
Hey Dickhead, let me give some ****ing background, because you don't
know what the **** your talking about and you can passs this on to your

little sluts at the FCC. Back in the late 90's (around 1997-1998) I
applied six times for a Low Power Television License for "a community
that doesn't have a local television service" (Waiver at 2) each time I

applied for for a license with a waiver the FCC would send them back
without considering them. (see Part 1.3 of Communication Act of 1934)

"The provisions of this chapter may be suspended, revoked,
amended, or waived for good cause shown, in whole or in part, at any
time by the Commission, subject to the provisions of the Administrative

Procedure Act and the provisions of this chapter. Any provision of the
rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on petition
if good
cause therefor is shown." (47CFR1.3)
The Court of Appeal has even gone farther stating the FCC "MUST

consider waivers" (Wait Radio v. FCC (1969) See Turro v. FCC(1986) See
Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC (1968) See United
States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.(1956) See Dunifer v.FCC (1998)
After applying six times for a license with a waiver I figured
it
was a waste of time and MONEY (unlike ham's who are handed a license)So

I went on the air without a license. I stopped after a short period and

applied for a low power radio license which we were one of 255 who
applied. That was short lived after the National Association of
Broadcasters (NAB) pushed congress to pass the Radio Broadcast
Preservation Act of 2001 and we lost are license because of it.
If this was ever to go to court I will argue that the FCC has
lied
all these years about the waiver process. The FCC would go to court
against a pirate radio station and argue that all they had to do is
apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But, when a person who never
pirated does apply for a license with a waiver they dismiss it without
consider it. The second thing I would ask the court by not consider my
waiver wasn't it in the public interest. Because before we applied for
a
low power television license we went around the community and asked the

people in the community if they would want a "Local TV" station and all

agree they did, So Where the public interest at???? Perhaps your little

Butt Buddies at the FCC can explain that to the courts.
BTW O'Dochartaigh is my surname you ****ing Nazi Scumbag