N9OGL wrote:
Reamping of last post:
Too bad you didn't take the time to do it right the first time,
eh?
FIRST OFF ####HEAD!!!!
I am not your mother, Todd.
I applied for a license long before I went on
the air without a license. Like I said before Steve you ####ing
###hole
you don't know what happen and your best bet is shut your ####ing pie
hole.
The last thing you want to do is even remotely appear to be
threatening me, Todd.
Hey ####head...
I told you I am not your mother.
.....let me give some ####ing background, because you don't
know what the #### your talking about and you can passs this on to
your
little ##### at the FCC.
There's nothing you can tell me tat will, in the very least
impress or "enlighten" me, Todd.
Back in the late 90's (around 1997-1998) I
applied six times for a Low Power Television License for "a community
that doesn't have a local television service" (Waiver at 2) each time
I
applied for for a license with a waiver the FCC would send them back
without considering them. (see Part 1.3 of Communication Act of 1934)
"The provisions of this chapter may be suspended, revoked,
amended, or waived for good cause shown, in whole or in part, at any
time by the Commission, subject to the provisions of the
Administrative
Procedure Act and the provisions of this chapter. Any provision of
the
rules may be waived by the Commission on its own motion or on
petition
if good cause therefor is shown." (47CFR1.3)
".....IF GOOD CAUSE IS SHOWN." My emphasis, since you only see
what you WANT to see, Todd.
The Court of Appeal has even gone farther stating the FCC "MUST
consider waivers" (Wait Radio v. FCC (1969) See Turro v. FCC(1986)
See
Rio Grande Family Radio Fellowship, Inc. v. FCC (1968) See United
States v. Storer Broadcasting Co.(1956) See Dunifer v.FCC (1998)
You can quote the National Anthem, Todd, and it won't change the
fact that YOU DO NOT QUALIFY TO BE AN FCC LICENSEE"...! ! ! !
After applying six times for a license with a waiver I figured it
was a waste of time and MONEY (unlike ham's who are handed a
license)So
I went on the air without a license.
Todd, the FCC doesn't care why you go on the air without a
license.
If you operate a radio transmitter without an appropriate station
license for any purpose other than summoning assistance in a life
threatening emergency, you're BREAKING THE LAW.
It really is THAT simple.
There is NO EXCUSE (other than the aforementioned LIFE THREATENING
emergency) for you to break ANY of those laws pertaining to the
operating of a rdio station in the United States.
Period.
I stopped after a short period and
applied for a low power radio license which we were one of 255 who
applied. That was short lived after the National Association of
Broadcasters (NAB) pushed congress to pass the Radio Broadcast
Preservation Act of 2001 and we lost are license because of it.
Oh boo hoo. You didn't qualify to be a licensee any way.
If this was ever to go to court I will argue that the FCC has lied
all these years about the waiver process.
Todd, it's been four years now. You're not in court. The only
reason YOU will be in court due to any FCC-related issue will be YOUR
wanton violation of the Communications Act.
The FCC would go to court
against a pirate radio station and argue that all they had to do is
apply for a license and ask for a waiver. But, when a person who
never
pirated does apply for a license with a waiver they dismiss it
without
consider it. The second thing I would ask the court by not consider
my
waiver wasn't it in the public interest.
Letting a foul mouthed, illiterate punk like you have a broadcast
station license is in the Public interest..?!?!
(Enter extremely long BWHAHAHAH here...I'll save bandwidth...)
Because before we applied for a
low power television license we went around the community and asked
the
people in the community if they would want a "Local TV" station and
all
agree they did, So Where the public interest at????
Then perhaps the community can retain a competent communications
lawyer to file an appropriate petition with the FCC to overcome their
unwillingness to let YOU have a station license.
And I say "competent communications lawyer" because letting YOU
handle "communications issues" is like letting Don Rickles handle
"sensitivity training" seminars.
Perhaps your little
Butt Buddies at the FCC can explain that to the courts.
What's to explain? You're not qualified to be a licensee. It
really is that simple.
BTW O'Dochartaigh is my surname you ####ing Nazi scumbag.
No, it's not, Todd. It may have been an old family name, but it's
not now. At least not on legal documents that you have filed with the
FCC.
And my point, you illiterate idiot, is that in the OTHER post you
SPELLED IT WRONG!
BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Steve, K4YZ
|