K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
wrote:
What does it matter whether I served in any military or not?
Kind of makes it hard to be a Veteran if you didn't serve.
Where has Jim EVER claimed ANY aspect of military or federal
service, Brian?
Quiterecently Jim has left it open whether he's served or not.
Now answer the man's question.
Jim did not direct his question to me.
Here's a hint: The Canadian military forces used Morse Code in
WW2.
Oh, now I see the connections. Because you saw photos of Ham
soldiers
in QST, and you're a ham, you "served" by extension. The coat-tail
connection.
You really are in a max-putz mode today, aren't you?
Sayonara-head to you, too.
WHERE did Jim EVER claim to be a Veteran? WHERE did he EVER say
he "served" in the Armed Forces?
He said that he served in unmentionable ways.
I could go on about the political and economic effects, but since
this
is a radio newsgroup I thought I'd stick to electronic and
radio subjects.
And Canadian war museum topics.
That happened to have a connection to radio communications.
Just "radio communications?" I thought this was the exclusive domain
of AMATEUR radio communications? Other forms of radio communications
knowledge and experiences have absolutely no bearing on this group.
You see, Brian, THAT is why you catch the flak taht yopu do for
your behaviour.
Spell much?
Just like Lennie, you like to stop where it serves you to do so
and ignore facts.
You'se guys have repeatedly said that this is about AMATEUR radio. Not
other radios and other radio services.
If I did talk about any military service I had, you would
be certain to make fun of it. It's just what you do, Len.
So typical.
You "served" in other ways. And Kelly has "real" military
experience.
Do YOU, Brain?
You were only a weatherman in the USAF. We can make all sorts of
issues if you want.
Yup. I aimed high. You aimed low. Jim and Kelly missed the target
altogether.
It's only those who disagree with you about Morse Code testing
that get your disrespect, abuse, name calling, and general
jack(expletive deleted] behavior.
Do you eat with that mouth?
Sure he does.
You kiss your wife with the same lips you have on Lennie's butt
all the time...Does SHE complain?
Interesting statement. Is that an opinion or is it an assertion of
fact?
Is there any reason to doubt that Steve, K4YZ, was involved
if he says he was?
Is there any reason to not apply Steve's rules of facts to Steve's
claims?
There are no "rules of facts".
If a "fact" has no documentation, then it's a "lie."
Things either "are" or they "are not".
Like: No Documentation = Lies. Like "seven hostile actions" is a
figment of your disturbed mind.
Like your ARES claims (are not true).
I proved it true.
And your Somalia claims
(are not true).
Just because I won't send you a QSL card...
Then there's your "unlicensed devices" claims. (are
not true).
What's not true?
I see. His mistake somehow justifies *your* behavior?
Mistake? He's had ample opportunity to correct that mistake.
Instead
he piles up the lies.
Thee was no mistake.
Thee is a mistake.
YOU have yet to cite a single error or lie, Brain. You keep
claiming one after another refuse to cite why ANY statement is a
"lie".
Many of your lies are so obviously lies that
There you go again - calling names.
"jack(expletive deleted] behavior"
Godwin invoked. You lose.
Why not use the person's name and callsign?
Kim, W5TIT.
Miccolis invoked. You lose.
Rest of your double-standards snipped.
If "double standards" were "snipped", you'd be extinct already.
I would not exist to you, Steve, because you would cease to exist.
How is it that Jim can say to use a person's name and call, yet he
repeatedly snipped Kim's call in his replies to her???
Miccolis invoked. Miccolis loses.