Thread
:
Lest We Forget
View Single Post
#
94
April 18th 05, 06:37 AM
[email protected]
Posts: n/a
From:
on Sun,Apr 17 2005 9:29 am
wrote:
From:
on Sat,Apr 16 2005 8:44 am
You're misquoting all over the place, Len. But it doesn't matter.
Here,
I'll clear it up:
This is NOT a court of law and "exactness" of quoting
is NOT required...except by those who live for the
pitiful "word battle" and self-glorification.
MARS and amateur radio aren't the same thing. But many radio amateurs
are involved in MARS.
The MILITARY Affiliate Radio System is DIRECTED by the
Department of Defense. They function quite well by
sole use of military personnel. See the links to the
actual words of the DoD DIRECTIVE posted in here...see
the links to several of the "Grecian Firebolt" radio
exercises posted in here.
That's my position. If Steve says different, argue with *him*.
Considering that James P. Miccolis is a "good buddie"
of that wonderful representative of a modern U.S.
Amateur Extra, that is a specious comment of yours. :-)
You HAVE supported him in the recent past and not long
ago disavowed any attempt to control his emotional
outbursts.
MARS always was and remains a MILITARY radio system.
But most of the participants aren't in the military.
How do YOU know?
I have sources, Len.
Tsk, tsk, tsk. That is acceptible ONLY to reputable
journalistic practice. YOU are NOT a "reputable
journalist." You do NOT have the qualifications.
You are NOT INVOLVED in journalism. :-)
Do you feel insulted by my posts, Len? It seems so - you seem to find
insult in everything.
Not me. You are the one with daydreaming about the
"need" of morsemanship in amateur radio licensing
test.
Oh, yes, that ties right in with a Canadian museum
having morse code in its window...sure...
Those windows really seem to bother you.
? I wash windows. I like Microsoft windows.
What "bothers" me is that a NON-SERVUNG (EVER) person
tried to make out like he was the "expert" on the
United States military use of radio.
You are NOT QUALIFIED for such a judgement. shrug
What has that to do with your claim that:
"If you ain't got the guts to tell the details, you AIN'T done it.
Simple as that."
That's what you wrote, Len. Does it only apply to Steve and not to
Brian.
Simple. Brian has NOT insulted me personally, not even
many times over. Robeson HAS and continues to do it.
I'm just showing what a damn LIAR he is.
What lie?
The claim he has made is that he found someone who knew you from when
you were allegedly at NADC. And that someone says you didn't do such a
great job there.
That's the LIE you are referring to.
Why do you say "allegedly" there? If you don't believe I
was there (I was), then Robeson's claim is irrelevant.
Why do you feel you are INVOLVED with Robeson?
You've already disavowed any capability of controlling
his emotional tantrums in here.
Now maybe it's true and maybe it isn't. But it's basically your word
against that of some unknown person.
IMAGINARY person.
I can't "disprove" something that doesn't exist.
If you wish a reference to the fact that I WAS at NADC
or that I worked with NADC engineers in the 1970s, you
can verify that with KD6JG.
Jimmie boy, you are getting VERY tiring with all this
"intellectual word gaming" in here. All you are doing
is WASTING TIME of others. I have plenty of time but
grow tired of your constant petulance. You have NO
return on any investment. All you seem to do is follow
your buddie's word and SUPPORT him. You have NO proof
that this imaginary "reference" of Robeson exists,
can NOT present it to anyone else. Why bother with
all your foolish word games in here? Are you that hard
up for something to do?
Bye. Off.
Reply With Quote