RadioBanter - View Single Post

April 18th 05, 10:45 AM

wrote:
From: on Sun,Apr 17 2005 9:29 am

wrote:
From: on Sat,Apr 16 2005 8:44 am

Psycho Pstevie still hasn't come up with a SINGLE
detail of "proof" on his insult of my "fitrep" at
NADC.

Nor have you proved him to be mistaken.

NO ONE can either "prove" or "disprove" the existance
of something that doesn't exist. :-)

You mean like problems caused by the licensing of people under the age
of 14 years?

You told FCC that no one under that age should be allowed to get a ham
license but you offer no proof of *any* problems caused by the lack of
such a rule.

You don't do what you demand of others, so why should anyone meet your
demands?

It's really just your word against his, Len.

He says somebody remembers you from a certain place and time. You say
no such person exists. Neither one of you offers any solid "proof".

PROVE Robeson is "telling the truth" on that "person."

"telling the truth on that person"? Perhaps you mean "telling the truth
about that person".

It's not my claim so it's not my job to prove it.

PROVE that "person's" existance to the REST OF THE
NEWSGROUP.

Why? I'm not the one making the claim that such a person exists or does
not exist.

And if K4YZ really did participate in seven hostile actions,
then it happened regardless of whether details are given or
not.

HOW DO YOU KNOW THAT IS TRUTH? :-)

It's basic logic, Len. If K4YZ really did participate in seven
hostile
actions, then it happened regardless of whether details are
given or not. That's objective reality.

Sorry, Jimmie, that's just plain BULLSNIT. :-)

No, it's not.

The only thing that "happened" is that Robeson tried
to imply that he was an experienced combat veteran.

Where? Being "involved in a hostile action" doesn't mean someone
actually fought in combat.

And maybe he *is* an experienced combat veteran.

You have tried to make that an ABSOLUTE TRUTH.

Nope.

All I've said is that:

"if K4YZ really did participate in seven hostile actions,
then it happened regardless of whether details are given or
not."

See the first word of that statement? *IF*.

Can't be done.

That's neither "objective" nor "reality."

It's both.

What seems to be operative here is that you are a BUDDIE
or Robeson and will support him in whatever he says in
here.

No, that's not true at all.

[do I have to elaborate on what "buddie" means?]

I know it already.

You have presented NO PROOF to anyone on this subject.

Sure I have. You just don't operate logically.

If Robeson had merely stated the WHERE and WHEN of those
"seven hostile actions," he MIGHT be believable.

Not to you. You'd make fun of him, like you always do.

He has
not done that yet. Ergo, after months of claiming such
he can only be considered a simple braggart. HE has NO
PROOF at all. Just a simple brag.

Apply that same standard to your buddy N0IMD...

Robeson has had ample time to embellish his BRAG or to
PRESENT PROOF to others. He has NOT done so.

Why should he tell you anything?

Put this matter to rest.

Are you telling me to shut up?

You have NOTHING on that subject.

Just logic.

"if K4YZ really did participate in seven hostile actions,
then it happened regardless of whether details are given or
not."

You've claimed that if someone doesn't give details then it didn't
happen. That's simply not objective reality.

You are wasting everyone's time manufacturing an "issue"
that doesn't exist.

If it doesn't exist, why are you so worked up about it?

Besides, you've "wasted everyone's time" on far more trivial things.
Like age limits for a ham license, with *no* proof that young amateurs
cause *any* problems in amateur radio. Or mistaken information about
USN encryption methods.

But I don't tell you to shut up.

Personally, I don't really care how good or bad your "fitrep" was X
years ago. Even if it was terrible - so what? Good or bad, it doesn't
make your behavior here or your flawed arguments any more acceptable.