K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
From: "bb" on Sun,Apr 17 2005 4:37 pm
Case in point is others' opinions. Robeson labels those
as "LIES," perhaps even "deceit" even though those are
just personal opinions. Apparently, in Stevieworld,
only Stevie Robeson has the "truth." Ergo, in the logic
of Stevieworld, ALL contrary (to Robeson's) opinions
are "LIES" as well as "errors" and "deceit."
That's quite sick. Irrational. Opinions are just
opinions.
Opinions are just opinions when they start off "My opinion on
the
subject is..."
Is that your official opinion?
Lies and deceit are things like "The ARRL BoD is dishonest" or
"ARES won't be able to respond becasue their members are too old and
oover obligated
Quite true, but Robeson hasn't learned to communicate
with rational people yet. He simply drives home a
blunt point that HE IS RIGHT with no proof or other
reference that it IS right.
(A) Neither Leonard H Anderson or Brian P Burke are rational.
They both make statements in public forum contrary to the presence of
data that contradicts their assertions.
Yet the data also contradict your assertions, and therein is where
one's opinion can be sourced. Even your own attempt at writing a
simple schedule for an ARES exercise refuted your very claims that ARES
alawys satisfies customers needs.
(B) Nice try on the "no proof" assertions, Lennie....And only
MORE proof that I am correct in calling you a liar.
I am correct in calling you a liar.
Your marionette is presently avoiding answering questions about
his assertions of the viability of ARES in the face of NUMEROUS news
releases to the contrary.
Speak of avoiding...
You are free to try rewriting the duty roster for that ARES exercise.
But please do adhere to customers expectations.
Huge snip of ususal obnxious verbosity to.....
That would be "usual."
Other Amateur Extras seem unable to take any strong
action to stop his pollution of all threads in this
newsgroup. All threads eventually turn into Robeson's
insults of all his "opponents" in any discussion.
A few have made negative comments to his style, notably
Hans Brakob. Responses to those by Robeson were less
than civil and uncomplimentary.
While I have no doubt that not everyone approves of my "up in
your
face" methology of dealing with the two of you, I DO notice that NONE
of them, other than to acknowledge your "First Amendment Right" to do
so, "support" YOUR presence here, Lennie.
It dosen't take one of those "inquiring minds" to know why....
You are both liiars.
You don't do what you'll say you'll do.
They're tired of the same "Back in 1953...." war satories.
You'e deceitful.
It really is THAT simple.
Steve, K4YZ
You've piled on the lies at an uprecedented rate in the past two weeks.
Why would we believe anything you might say today?