"Tarapia Tapioco" wrote in message
x.it...
In article
Dave Heil wrote:

I don't see Roger much at all. I saw him once and he bolted.

You are lying again. He left after the meeting ended. And
"Lurch," you still need help with your bad comb-over, from what
he described. Your brain processes seem to mirror that
character's, if nbot your appearance.

That is absolutely false. I post nowhere on the internet
other than as
myself. You are the one who seems to see me everywhere.

Now, you're still lying, but you lie every time you post, under
your own name or not.

As I said, my statements are easily verified. Here's a task
for you,
anonymous one: Come up with verifiable proof to the contrary.

Too bad nobody takes your "assignments," or any orders from you,
Nazi.

Do an internet search on Roger Wiseman, AB8MQ or KC8JBO.
That'll reveal
that Roger is known only for 1) being in hot water with the
FCC and 2)
posting filthy rants in newsgroups. He's quite the asset to
amateur
radio.

I can't be bothered. Since your "opinion" of him carries about
as much weight with me as it does with evberybody else but your
toadies. His "hot water with the FCC" consists of a warning
letter from 1999, which may or may not indicate anything, a
cautionary letter to him and another ham not to carry online
arguments on the air again from 1999, and a retest letter which
Roger passed from 2000, all from 5 years ago. Can't find
anything recent, though, can you? Why is that? If he is such a
"qrmer" as you assert, why hasn't he gotten any more letters?
Your reasoning is flawed, like you.
And his "filthy" posts are not half as bad as your posts, or
others. You sure do like haveing the old Nazi spirit alive,
don't you?

Roger now keeps a very, very, very low profile on the air--for
good
reason.

Not so. You just can't find him on the air. But with work and
other things, he probably has better things to do that stay on
the radio 24/7. Isn't have a balance what is in your amateur
code? You probably spend more time on the radio than with your
family. I can't blame them for encouraging that.

"You whining"?

Typo, Nazi. "Your whining." Is that better for your narrow mind?

Your claim of lies rings quite hollow from one who must
hide behind anonymous remailers. Now if you had the courage
of your
convictions, you'd use your name and stand behind your
statements.
You can't do that.

The only thing ringing hollow is your own pompousity echoing in
^^^^^^^^^^
"pomposity" is the correct form Woger. At least learn the correct
form and usage of these advanced words, if you are going to continue
using them in your psycobabble.



your hollow skull. I stand by my convictions, and others who use
anonimity who agree with you, you have no problem with them
using "anonimity." Are you like Nursie, using a double standard?

You're absolutely right.

I'm glad you can see that, finally.