Tarapia Tapioco wrote:
In article
Dave Heil wrote:
I don't see Roger much at all. I saw him once and he bolted.
You are lying again. He left after the meeting ended.
Sorry, that isn't correct. The meeting ended and a tour of the
communications van ensued. During that period, you bolted, never to be
seen again.
And
"Lurch," you still need help with your bad comb-over, from what
he described.
He must have given one of your other personalities some bum info,
Wiseman/UnWiseman. I have a full head of hair. If you were taller,
you'd know. Why this fascination with my hair, Roger?
Your brain processes seem to mirror that
character's, if nbot your appearance.
Are you entering the big Stephen King look-alike contest this summer?
Nbot?
That is absolutely false. I post nowhere on the internet
other than as
myself. You are the one who seems to see me everywhere.
Now, you're still lying, but you lie every time you post, under
your own name or not.
Offer up some proof.
As I said, my statements are easily verified. Here's a task
for you,
anonymous one: Come up with verifiable proof to the contrary.
Too bad nobody takes your "assignments," or any orders from you,
Nazi.
You made a claim. Offer up some proof.
Do an internet search on Roger Wiseman, AB8MQ or KC8JBO.
That'll reveal
that Roger is known only for 1) being in hot water with the
FCC and 2)
posting filthy rants in newsgroups. He's quite the asset to
amateur
radio.
I can't be bothered.
Hint: I doubted you'd do so. You already know what would be found.
Since your "opinion" of him carries about
as much weight with me as it does with evberybody else but your
toadies.
It has nothing to do with my opinion. It has to do with what a Google
search reveals.
His "hot water with the FCC" consists of a warning
letter from 1999, which may or may not indicate anything...
May or may not reveal anything? Why do you believe you were sent a
warning letter?
...a cautionary letter to him and another ham not to carry online
arguments on the air again from 1999...
Why do you think that one was sent?
and a retest letter which
Roger passed from 2000, all from 5 years ago.
Why do you think the retest was mandated?
Can't find
anything recent, though, can you? Why is that? If he is such a
"qrmer" as you assert, why hasn't he gotten any more letters?
I'd guess he'd have to be a bigger fool than is commonly supposed to
tempt fate, don't you, Roger/UnRoger?
Your reasoning is flawed, like you.
My reasoning in suggesting doing the Google search? Why not offer up a
few of the positive things your good friend Roger has done with his
life?
And his "filthy" posts are not half as bad as your posts, or
others.
Sorry, that is totally incorrect.
You sure do like haveing the old Nazi spirit alive,
don't you?
I have no affiliation with the National Socialists nor AARP.
Roger now keeps a very, very, very low profile on the air--for
good
reason.
Not so.
So.
You just can't find him on the air.
One can't find what isn't there.
But with work and
other things, he probably has better things to do that stay on
the radio 24/7.
I'm sure "he" is long on other things and short on work.
Isn't have a balance what is in your amateur
code?
"Have a balance"? No, I don't find that in "my" amateur code.
I have many interests, UnWiseman. Amateur radio is but one of them.
You probably spend more time on the radio than with your
family.
Then again, you'd have no way of knowing.
I can't blame them for encouraging that.
Then again, you know nothing of them.
"You whining"?
Typo, Nazi. "Your whining." Is that better for your narrow mind?
Just remember it the next time you go on about one of my errors.
Your claim of lies rings quite hollow from one who must
hide behind anonymous remailers. Now if you had the courage
of your
convictions, you'd use your name and stand behind your
statements.
You can't do that.
The only thing ringing hollow is your own pompousity echoing in
your hollow skull.
I stand by my convictions, and others who use
anonimity who agree with you, you have no problem with them
using "anonimity." Are you like Nursie, using a double standard?
If you stood by your convictions, you'd have no need to hide behind
anonymous remailers. You previously used your call as part of your
email address and you got tossed from several ISP's as a result of your
warm and friendly manner.
Your statement (above) is one of the most convoluted pieces of work I've
ever encountered. As to "anonimity", I'd let you slide but one doesn't
often make a typo twice. The word is "anonymity".
You're absolutely right. Nobody has to do so. You being a stand
up guy, I thought surely you'd want to let us know what you'd done
with your life. That you choose not to do so just makes your claims
look like sad, plaintive cries in the night. Off to the rest of the cockroaches with you.
I'm glad you can see that, finally.
I've seen that all along.
Dave K8MN
|