George Orwell wrote:
In article
Dave Heil wrote:

During that period, you bolted, never to be seen again.

I did? When I've never been to one of your "meetings?"

Sure, you have. You were the short fellow with the Stephen King mask.

Besides, you just got caught lying again. And how long would it
take to look over a van?

It took the rest of us some time. Your tour was shorter. You fled.

Guess you don't get out much.

Are you asking me for a date?


I have a full head of hair. If you were taller,
you'd know. Why this fascination with my hair, Roger?

Now, Lurch the Nazi, you seem to see Roger everywhere. You have
a bad comb-over from what was described to me. And all grey
hair. Too bad you dye your eyebrows, but you probably are vain
like that.

It'd be strange for Roger Wiseman to have a fixation on my hair and
eyebrows. It would be far more peculiar for you, a person you claim not
to be Roger Wiseman to have such a fixation--especially when you worry
that I don't go out enough.

Are you entering the big Stephen King look-alike contest this

summer?

No, since I don't look like Steven King.

Don't be modest. You're a shoo-in for first prize.


Nbot?


What's "Nbot"????

Don't you recognize it? You wrote it: "Your brain processes seem to
mirror that character's, if nbot your appearance."



Offer up some proof.

That was my response to:

"Now, you're still lying, but you lie every time you post, under
your own name or not."

You first, liar.

Me first at what, UnWiseman?





His "hot water with the FCC" consists of a warning
letter from 1999, which may or may not indicate anything...

May or may not reveal anything? Why do you believe you were

sent a

warning letter?


I wasn't. Roger was.

Oh, I see.


...a cautionary letter to him and another ham not to carry

online

arguments on the air again from 1999...

Why do you think that one was sent?

Mainly because Roger alerted the FCC to it.

I'm beginning to see a pattern. "Roger" received a cautionary letter
because "Roger" alerted the FCC to it. That makes about as much sense
as anything else you've posted.


and a retest letter which
Roger passed from 2000, all from 5 years ago.

Why do you think the retest was mandated?

Hmmmm?



My reasoning in suggesting doing the Google search? Why not offer up a
few of the positive things your good friend Roger has done with his
life?

Hmmmm?

Sorry, that is totally incorrect.

Your posts are on Google for all to see.

They most certainly are. None of them has material consisting of vile,
vulgar references to someone's parents, children or spouse. None of
them depicts filthy acts of homosexuality, incest or pedophilia.
Yours, on the other hand...

I have no affiliation with the National Socialists nor AARP.


Not "offically", but you sure do embrace the supression of
freedom of speech, Nazi.

Your rights end where they infringe upon mine.

So.


Not so. I imagine Roger gets on the air. You just would try to
qrm him, wouldn't you?

You see--there's your problem. You assume that everyone thinks and acts
like you do. You're socially defective.




I am referencing Paul Segal's "The Amateur's Code" written in
1928.

The Radio Amateur is...
{edit}
Balanced....radio is an avocation, never interfering with duties
owed to a family, job, school,orcommunity.

That's just lovely coming from the local filth monger. You're one of
the most unbalanced people I've run into in years, UnWiseman. You're a
problem to amateur radio and a problem to your community. You haven't a
family.



If you stood by your convictions, you'd have no need to hide behind
anonymous remailers. You previously used your call as part of your
email address and you got tossed from several ISP's as a result of your
warm and friendly manner.

Would you like some cheese with all that whine? I never used "my
call" as part of my email address, Nazi. And I've never gotten
tossed from my ISP, either.

Sure, sure, Roger--and you've never had troubles with the FCC and never
had troubles with local law enforcement. You're a regular model citizen.

Your statement (above) is one of the most convoluted pieces of

work I've

ever encountered.
Sort of like your screw up of "That's incorrect yet again"...or
any number of errors.
Like "Nbot" above.

*Just like* "Nbot" above. You wrote it and even *you* didn't know what
it meant.

You're absolutely right. Nobody has to do so. You being a stand
up guy, I thought surely you'd want to let us know what you'd done
with your life. That you choose not to do so just makes your claims
look like sad, plaintive cries in the night. Off to the rest of the
cockroaches with you.

Dave K8MN