David wrote:

On Mon, 2 May 2005 22:17:00 -0400, "Gary Schnabl"
wrote:

And??? Is someone supposed to glean over the entire blog? Why can't you
present something current and meaningful so as to bolster your claim that AA
is so popular in NYC or elsewhere? After all, you brought up the claim...

Who knows? Maybe AA is as popular as you seem to believe. But I haven't seen
anything yet to make me think that it is.

I noticed that of their 55 stations three of them are in Hawaii. Are the
radiclibs so fearful that they may lose all those electoral votes that they
need three outlets there? And that one Alaskan AA outlet surely must cover
that tiny state!

And two stations in Boston? Are their signal contours so weak that they need
two stations to blanket that immense metropolis? Or are they perhaps weak
stations in the exoburbs?

The AA outlet in my Detroit was the former third-place (at best) full-time
sports talker. Not much of a gamble for them to switch formats. There are
already too many religion stations here.

I just reported what was said. Argue with them if you like. I'm not
up for it.

BTW: It ain't about votes. It's about entertainment first, then it's
about breaking the stranglehold that the lunatic fringe has over talk
radio. Beating the Weiner Nation in New York is a start.

Crap, I thought YOU were the President of the Weiner Nation, 'tard boy.

Now you just go take your meds and contemplate toting it.

dxAce
Michigan
USA