On Fri, 6 May 2005 17:30:43 -0400, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

my original post that you responded too said

nothing about freeband.

LMAO,what a lying POS you are...that's why you changed the topic
header,,so the post I replied to regarding freeband would be
forgot...what a CARD!

LMAO,what a lying POS you are...thats why you changed the topic to
freeband. so the post that i made regarding 11 meters would be
forgot..what a card!

in fact it said

11 meter cb spread spectrum? i don't think so.
nothing about freeband there


Only because you suffer a great moronic communcation deficit..as it is
there plainly for the entire world to see, but you, for some odd reason,
express magnicent failure regarding your memory, intellect, and
communication skill. Here it is again,,,open wide:


you suffer from moronic communication deficet, there was nothing there
about freeband. so here it is again,open wide little boy:

__________________________________________________ __________

From: (FreebandÂ*sucks)
On Tue, 3 May 2005 12:52:19 -0400, "Stu"
wrote:
"Cmd Buzz Corey" wrote in message
news Frank Gilliland wrote:
Now that's interesting. I didn't know that the ARRL was a government
supported organization, or that REACT was -not- supported. Got a link
that tells how much funding each organization receives and from where?
snip
-
The federal government, NORAD and Homeland Security, have ham radio in
their planning for emergency comms, CB isn't even a consideration.
-
Not sure about A3E & J3E modes, but at least two advanced CB modes do
figure in to national plans. They are CB spread-spectrum and packet.
Stu

11 meter cb spread spectrum? i don't think so.
Digital Spread has another name when applied to such. Ask an
upperclassman hammie to elmer you with this difficulty you profess.


_____________________________________________

now off you go little boy,thanks for playing, next time come back with
your thinking cap on!