Exactly my point....
We break into two groups of thought here...
Halt at this point, and lay all plans on that halting (and, if ALL the
others don't agree--be bypassed anyway)...
Or, stay with the pack, realizing if that day ever comes (technology ceases
to innovate/obsolete)--we will regret it...
Progress, obsolete equip., is the most desirable thing I can imagine! It is
a given, not all will agree... Indeed, at 52 years of age, my place in the
"scope of the world" is becomming smaller--it only gets worse from now on--I
am not ready to quit and attempt to force others to that "quitting" with
me...
When the "Dick Tracy Wrist Radio" is finally designed and
implemented--perhaps there will be a "death of homebrewers" (I myself am NOT
much of a 'watchbuilder')--but until then we can have fun!
Warmest regards,
John
--
When Viagra fails to work--you are DOOMED!!!
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
...
| John Smith wrote:
| gb:
|
| Well, we certainly need to examine the "bottle neck" and remove it...
before
| we are doomed...
|
| If we can't institute this "radical" idea here, we need to look at
Canada,
| Mexico, So. America, China, India, etc...
|
| When there are as many functional radios (or "cards") hitting the
dumpster
| as there are functional computers and related equip. (replaced with
| upgrades) we will know the right idea has prevailed and radio has come
| home...
|
| I hope you are kidding, John. That is the absolutely worst part of the
| PC paradigm. Thousands of perfectly good electronics thrown out, often
| made obsolete due to software that is bloated and poorly written (mostly
| OS software. At least old radios are still useable
|
| I would think there must be some EXCELLENT argument/reasoning serving as
a
| road block, or else, others are simply going to pass us by...
|
| The PC paradigm is a poor one, and not to be emulated. PC's will
| finally be mature when we don't have to replace them on almost a yearly
| basis. At that point, software writers will be able to write good
software.
|
| - Mike KB3EIA -
|