I owned the FRG-7 sold under the Sears name. It was a decent receiver,
and a reasonably good performer in it's day. Because it's design is
dated, tuning around is more complicated than it should be, the
receiver has only 1 filter of average selectivity, etc.

The ongoing hype surrounding the FRG-7 inflates it's image beyond it's
capabilities and as a consequence it is usually overpriced on Ebay.




Namikis wrote:
Still, no harm buying one and comparing. I need a decent analog to
compare
to the R75 and the SW8. Never owned a frog.
"John S." wrote in message
oups.com...
As with any review eham reviews present the opinion of the writer.
I
find eham reviews useful with the understanding that not all owners
have the same technical experience.