K4YZ wrote: 
  wrote: 
  Dee Flint wrote: 
 
  Extras  38,852 
  Advanced  39,430 
  General  25,245 
  Tech Plus  22,634 
  Tech  24,021 
  Novice  2,627 
  
  Total members = 152,809 
  
  Total Techs = 46,655 or ~30% of the ARRL membership are Techs vs. 
 ~50% 
  of all licensees. There's a shortfall of Techs within the 
membership 
  but certainly not any sort of "yawning gap" in the representation 
of 
  Techs at the ARRL (or vice versa) as Hans has implied. 
 
     If we throw out those Novices, which aren't any appreciable 
number, 
 then the percentages look like this: 
 
      Extras:    25.52% 
 
      Advanced:  25.91% 
 
      General:   16.25% 
 
      Techs:     30.65% 
 
      ...or leave the Novices in...it only changes the percentages by 
 1/10th or thereabouts of a percent... 
 
      Nonetheless...The Techs DO comprise a significant membership 
base 
 in the ARRL...Enough to be a significant voting block if they wanted 
 to. 
 
      So why don't they? 
 
Why should they? Do the Techs have some big problem with the League 
which went over my head? 
 
      Lennie and Brain contend that they are somehow a repressed 
subset 
 of the membership, 
 
Those two "contend" a lotta things which are bass ackward and/or 
off-the-wall. They're your turf, enjoy, I can't be bothered. 
 
 yet there's not a single impediment to ANY person 
 with ANY specific interest in ARRL policies or programs from pushing 
 for changes in those programs and policies if they so choose. 
 
      If anything, we should be asking why are the Generals so 
 inequitably represented in the ARRL membership. 
 
Fixing that gross inequity will involve the creation of yet another 
department at HQ based on the next PBI which we haven't seen yet. 
 
 
      The ARRL is, afterall, a membership organization. If in this day 
 and age there's not been some major effort to organize a major change 
 to the ARRL's policies and programs, then apparently they ARE 
 representing the opinions of their demographic fairly evenly. 
 
AMEN, that's the whole point and the only point which actually matters 
in the context of this thread. 
 
      If there was such a disaffection for the ARRL, where's the 
 "alter-ARRL"...?!?! 
 
Been tried several times and they all died almost on the spot. 
 
 
 73 
 
 Steve, K4YZ 
 
w3rv 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |