View Single Post
  #205   Report Post  
Old May 10th 05, 08:47 PM
I AmnotGeorgeBush
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Fri, 6 May 2005 10:40:38 -0400,
(I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
Self taught based on nothing more than personal thought you mistakenly
refer as empirical observation isn't a valid method.

Why not?


Because opinion does not equate empirical data.

It is far too complex to have evolved totally


randomly.


(That's an argument used by primitive civilations to explain things
which they do not understand. If you want to be a part of an enlightened
society, the first thing you need to learn is that complexity does not
require divine providence. But if that concept is beyond your level of
comprehension you can always take up astrology, voodoo, crystal ball
gazing..... or even republican economics.)


The ancients sacrificed each other to the "Gods" of the sky when they
were angry (thunder, heavy storms)...same goes for the Gods of the sea,
the four winds, etc. St. Elmo's Fire was attributed to the Gods by the
old salts and still is in superstitious circles of the old time
fishermen...

Any sufficiently advanced technology is


indistinguishable from magic....




It wasn't referred as magic.

The more answers you learn, the more


questions you discover. It's a never ending


quest.


Dave


"Sandbagger"


n3cvj



At least I'm enjoying the ride.