Richard:

I am confused... is "conjugate mirror" used in regards or "isogamic
copulation" or "orgasmic copulation"--and does this involve mirrors on the
ceiling?

If so, a younger guy(s) and/or gal(s) may be needed here... grin

And, really, I wondering if a definition can be given in mixed company!!!!

Warmest regards,
John
--
Sit down the six-pack!!! STEP AWAY!!! ...and go do something...

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
| On Thu, 12 May 2005 10:04:12 -0700, Jim Kelley
| wrote:
|
| You need to define the particular aspect being conjugated. For example,
|
| Hi Jim,
|
| In fact I don't (which is the whole point of ANY characteristic being
| conjugated) because it doesn't matter. There is no aspect (of what
| you observe) that is without its conjugate being mirrored. However,
| your presumption:
| the person I see in the mirror appears to be right handed.
| already disqualifies your answer.
|
| The "effluvium" as you described it, was literally true, and
| necessary. Being ignored, it has precipitated my projected
| expectation:
| ... Computation of gain comes with the answer (and in all
| likelihood so will considerable error).
|
| The "effluvium" as you described it, was literally true as the
| discussion (also anticipated) has been reduced to the frame of the
| mirror (as so commonly happens in these threads) while abandoning the
| substance of the conjugate mirror. This, of course, compounds the
| observation above about the rapid descent into errant discussion.
|
| Anyway, the original challenge:
| What would you see if you looked into a conjugate mirror?
| is meaningful within the context of the Subject line, but perhaps is a
| bit too abstract (after all, it does require a knowledge of sight and
| conjugation, not a simple coupling of experience). For those who
| fear Shakespeare, there is only one three syllable word.
|
| Someone may yet stumble on the answer. ;-)
|
| 73's
| Richard Clark, KB7QHC