Thread
:
Beware of hams planting dis-information...
View Single Post
#
7
May 13th 05, 03:25 PM
I AmnotGeorgeBush
Posts: n/a
From:
(Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 11 May 2005 11:38:40 -0400,
(I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From:
(Dave=A0Hall)
it primarily the left who are
spearheading an intensified effort to remove
all signs of religion from government
processes, even though most have been
around since this country was founded.
So has crime. What is wrong with seeking to remove that of which the law
clearly defines?
Nothing, if that's indeed the case.
You just said it was. You are second guessing only yourself.
But those
religious influences are adorned all over our
government buildings and in our government
business. Why is it only now do certain people
find exception to it?
You are one of the most vocal in this group to redundantly invoke that
just because something is practiced far and wide doesn't make it legal
or right,,,,but of course, it does when you agree with it.
When it's not illegal, I agree with it.
The fact is that despite recent
misinterpretations of the establishment clause
in the constitution by left wing zealots, we
have had religious influences in our
government from the very beginning.
That's rich..and wrong. Once again I ask you to explain how anything
these "left wingers" say or do or interpret can matter at all regarding
this issue while the republicans control the house and senate.
Nevertheless, the misinterpretation has been all yours even though Frank
neatly wrapped it all up and presented you with the facts clearly
indicating congress shall keep the clause of separation of church and
state intact. Because you agree with the religious zealots and have on
many occasion admitted that your moral views are to be fostered upon
others and if they do not subscribe to your radical positions and
admitted (on many occasion) socialistic tendencies, you mistakenly hold
them as an enemy of yourself, seeking to take away that of which you
believe.
I would argue that it was those influences
which made this country one of strong moral
and ethical principles.
In one sentence you claim the moral and ethical principles of this
country have degraded terribly and even said society was reflected on
the air. Now you say the country is once again of strong moral fiber and
ethical principle. You flip flop more than Bush. And please don't ask
for examples of Bush flip flopping, as you attempted this in the past,
were given a major list of examples, and began to spin excuses for WHY
he flip flopped, distancing yourself from your claim that he never did.
It's no coincidence that
the decline in governmental ethics and
morality
There you go again,,,flip...flop!
correspond with efforts to eradicate
religious influences from our lives.
I wouldn't go so far as to put it blatantly in those terms, but I do
believe taking God and physical punishment out of the schools was a
serious mistake.
There was once a day when democrats and
republicans practiced a little thing called
compromise.
There was also a day when the working guys of each party could think for
themselves instead of widely swallowing their party line rhetoric and
blaming those who aren't anywhere near leadership positions in this
country for all the woes and incompetence of your own party. That is the
most pedestrian act you have attempted to date. Scary thing is, you
appear to actually believe yourself when you post such drivel. You
simply can not handle the responsibility of the buck stopping with the
leader you selected. In other words, you seek to blame others when
responsibility for your leader's action must be taken. Blaming another
political party for the last four and a half years of confirmed failures
illustrate you really have too great a deal to learn in order to
effectively discuss the political process.
Dave
"Sandbagger"
N3CVJ
Reply With Quote